ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2005
Direct transmission of H. pylori from challenged to nonchallenged mice in a single cage.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment of Noninvasive Methods for the Detection ofBioMed research international · 2022Article
- Pathogenesis of chronic wasting disease in cervidized transgenic mice.The American journal of pathology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To understand whether direct transmission of H. pylori occurs from infected mouse to noninfected mouse, the system using a mouse model we developed previously was tested. Six nude mice were challenged with H. pylori inocula; one group consisted of one challenged nude mouse 1 week after inoculation raised with four nonchallenged nude mice in a single cage. For the single cage, a polycarbonate cage or a mesh-floor cage was used. Then three groups were kept in a polycarbonate cage and the other three groups kept in a mesh-floor cage to avoid H. pylori transmission through stool. After coraising for 1, 2, or 3 weeks, all mice were sacrificed to determine the existence of H. pylori in the stomach, saliva, and stool by culture or PCR and H. pylori-associated gastritis. RAPD fingerprinting patterns using different primers of isolated strains from challenged and nonchallenged mice were compared to understand the origin of transmitted strains. During 3 weeks after coraising of H. pylori challenged and nonchallenged mice, H. pylori was detected in the stomachs in 3 of 12 nonchallenged mice in the polycarbonate cage and in 2 of 12 nonchallenged mice in the cage with a steel mesh floor. H. pylori was detected from saliva or stool in two nonchallenged, infected mice in the polycarbonate cage. Moreover, RAPD fingerprinting using different primers of the total five strains isolated from five nonchallenged, infected mice in both cages showed the same pattern and concordance with that of the challenged strain and the strains isolated from challenged mice. It is demonstrated that intimate interaction is the cause of H. pylori transmission via saliva and stool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15986860What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.