Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15986258›Full record

SynthesisDer Nervenarzt2006

[Suicidality in depressive children and adolescents during treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Review and meta-analysis of the available randomised, placebo controlled trials].

M Holtmann, S Bölte, F Poustka

Abstract readEnglish AbstractMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Der Nervenarzt, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Depression in children and adolescents.BMJ clinical evidence · 2009
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Major Depressive Disorder and Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonists.Translational perioperative and pain medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M HoltmannKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters, Klinikum der Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/Main. holtmann@em.uni-frankfurt.de
S Bölte
F Poustka
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to concerns that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) might be associated with an increased risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in depressive children and adolescents, treatment with these drugs is controversial. All available data from randomised controlled trials on SSRIs treating depression in these age groups were examined regarding efficacy and suicidality. Results suggest that fluoxetine and, less clearly, sertraline are effective in such treatment. A meta-analysis yielded no statistically significant difference between treatment with SSRI and placebo with regard to the occurrence of suicidal behavior. Following evidence-based criteria, the risk:benefit ratio is favourable for fluoxetine and sertraline. Their use in the pharmacotherapy of depressive children and adolescents is indicated.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationChildChild, PreschoolDepressionFemaleHumansIncidenceMalePlacebo EffectRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSuicide, AttemptedAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID15986258
OpenAlexW2600360804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.