Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15986235›Full record

ReviewDiabetologia2005

The changing epidemiology of diabetic microangiopathy in type 1 diabetes.

P Rossing

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetologia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comprehensive bioinformatics andFrontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Acute Kidney Injury and Progression of Diabetic Kidney Disease.Advances in chronic kidney disease · 2018
    Review
  5. The Global Epidemiology of Diabetes and Kidney Disease.Advances in chronic kidney disease · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Inner retinal oxygen delivery and metabolism in streptozotocin diabetic rats.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. How to survive diabetes.Diabetologia · 2009
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P RossingSteno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 2, 2820 Gentofte, Denmark. pro@steno.dk
Steno Diabetes Center · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic microvascular complications in the kidney and the eye are a major burden for diabetic patients due to increased morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease and diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness in younger patients, representing a major public health concern. During the past two decades beneficial effects of, in particular, aggressive antihypertensive control and strict glycaemic control have been demonstrated in randomised controlled clinical trials. Technological improvements in diabetes care have made good metabolic control easier to achieve. Has this led to an improved prognosis? In observational studies from dedicated centres, a decrease from 47 to 13% has been reported in the incidence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy after 20-25 years of diabetes, and the incidence of overt diabetic nephropathy after 20 years has decreased from 28 to 5.8%. Even functional and morphological remission of diabetic nephropathy has been reported. Despite this, recent population-based studies have failed to demonstrate a decrease in the incidence of blindness caused by diabetes, and the incidence of end-stage renal disease has progressively increased. This may, in part, be the result of a combination of increasing numbers of diabetic patients and a lag phase between improvement in management and a decline in end-stage complications. It is of concern, however, that the results from specialised centres may not apply to routine diabetes care. It is, therefore, mandatory that the beneficial effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions demonstrated in clinical trials and recommended by treatment guidelines are translated into clinical practice to ensure a widespread improvement in prognosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic AngiopathiesDiabetic NephropathiesDiabetic RetinopathyHumans

Identifiers

PMID15986235
OpenAlexW2048851491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.