ArticleMycopathologia2005
The contribution of galactomannan detection in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in bone marrow transplant recipients.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Galactomannan detection for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Instability of Aspergillus galactomannan in stored clinical samples.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
- Insufficient demonstration of long-term stability of Aspergillus galactomannan.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
- Long-term stability at -20 °C of Aspergillus galactomannan in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
- Significant decline in Galactomannan Signal during storage of clinical serum samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013Article
- Update on the contribution of galactomannan for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis.Mycopathologia · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Until recently, accurate microbiological diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA) was seldom established in HSCT recipients. Blood samples are rarely positive for Aspergillus species, the reliability of the cultures depends of the specimen (if taken from a normally sterile site or not) and biopsy samples require invasive procedures, rarely recommended in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Implementing the international consensus defining the microbiological criteria for the diagnosis of Aspergillus infection, we retrospectively evaluated the role of serum galactomannan (GM) detection by EIA to diagnose IA among HSCT patients with proven invasive fungal infection (IFI) and the impact of serum storage in GM concentrations. The EIA assay allowed categorizing as "probable" 5 of the 10 cases of "possible" aspergillosis (50%). Considering a lower cut-off level for the reaction (1.0), 80% of the cases could be categorized as "probable" aspergillosis. Positive or undetermined results were detected one to 4 months before the diagnosis of IA in eight of the 11 patients (72.7%) with proven IFI. Retesting the stored samples after a second storage for four years, we could observe lower reactivity in 20% of the samples. The detection of galactomannan by the EIA test represents a major advance in the diagnosis of IA in HSCT recipients at high risk of IA. A better understanding of the kinetics of the GM in different clinical situations is necessary to maximize the benefit of the test in Aspergillus surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15983733What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.