Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15980946›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2005

Glutathione peroxidase activity in patients with renal disorders.

Mohamed A El-Far, Mohamed A Bakr, Sami E Farahat, Elsaid A Abd El-Fattah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antioxidants: a comprehensive review.Archives of toxicology · 2025
    Review
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Flavonoid-Rich Extract ofMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed A El-FarDivision of Biochemistry, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. ElfarMA2002@yahoo.com
Mohamed A Bakr
Sami E Farahat
Elsaid A Abd El-Fattah
Mansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlutathione peroxidase (GPx) protects cells from oxidative damage by catalyzing the reduction of both organic and hydrogen peroxides, using glutathione as a reducing agent. Both plasma GPx (P-GPx) and erythrocyte GPx (E-GPx) have been identified in human blood. Kidney proximal tubular cells are the main source of GPx activity in the plasma. Oxidative damage has been reported to participate in the progression and complications of renal diseases.

methodsThe activities of both E-GPx and P-GPx were determined, using Randox commercial kits, in 12 patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS), 48 patients with renal impairment (RI), and 50 patients with chronic renal failure on maintenance hemodialysis (HD; before as well as immediately after dialysis), and in 50 healthy volunteers who served as controls.

resultsCompared to the results in healthy controls, P-GPx activity was reduced in the HD group and the RI group, whereas the NS group showed no significant difference from the control. The HD group showed a higher drop in P-GPx (reduced to 36.6% of the mean control value) than the RI group (reduced to 61.8% of the mean control value). Further analysis of the RI group showed a highly significant negative correlation between P-GPx activity and serum creatinine level (r = -0.691; P < 0.001). Also, a highly significant negative correlation was found between P-GPx and blood urea nitrogen (r = -0.792; P < 0.001). However, E-GPx activity showed no significant correlation with either serum creatinine or blood urea nitrogen. E-GPx was reduced to 55.2% and 68.9% of the mean control 1 value in the NS group and the RI group respectively, while the HD group showed no significant change. Further analysis of the RI group found that E-GPx activity showed no significant correlation with either serum creatinine or blood urea nitrogen. In HD patients, GPx activity was measured before and immediately after hemodialysis. E-GPx activity was similar before and after dialysis, without a significant difference (pre-dialysis, 37.7 +/- 13.5 U/g hemoglobin [Hb]; post-dialysis, 38.72 +/- 12.31 U/g Hb). However, P-GPx activity was significantly increased (pre-dialysis, 254.4 +/- 62.6 U/ml; post-dialysis, 296.98 +/- 74.04 U/ml; P < 0.001), but it was still significantly lower when compared to that in the healthy controls.

conclusionsP-GPx activity is an important test to assess the oxidative damage in patients with kidney diseases. The progression of renal disorders is accompanied by a decrease in P-GPx activity, but not by a decrease in E-GPx activity. Thus, we conclude that P-GPx activity largely depends on physiological renal function, whereas E-GPx activity does not.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkersCreatinineErythrocytesFemaleGlutathione PeroxidaseHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedNephrotic SyndromeOxidative StressRemission InductionRenal DialysisBiomarkersCreatinineGlutathione Peroxidase

Identifiers

PMID15980946
OpenAlexW2018882601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.