Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15980546›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2005

Kinefold web server for RNA/DNA folding path and structure prediction including pseudoknots and knots.

A Xayaphoummine, T Bucher, H Isambert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational modeling of cotranscriptional RNA folding.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Guide to Computational Cotranscriptional Folding Featuring the SRP RNA.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. DrForna: visualization of cotranscriptional folding.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A XayaphoummineLaboratoire de Dynamique des Fluides Complexes, CNRS-ULP, Institut de Physique, 3 rue de l'Université, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
T Bucher
H Isambert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Kinefold web server provides a web interface for stochastic folding simulations of nucleic acids on second to minute molecular time scales. Renaturation or co-transcriptional folding paths are simulated at the level of helix formation and dissociation in agreement with the seminal experimental results. Pseudoknots and topologically 'entangled' helices (i.e. knots) are efficiently predicted taking into account simple geometrical and topological constraints. To encourage interactivity, simulations launched as immediate jobs are automatically stopped after a few seconds and return adapted recommendations. Users can then choose to continue incomplete simulations using the batch queuing system or go back and modify suggested options in their initial query. Detailed output provide (i) a series of low free energy structures, (ii) an online animated folding path and (iii) a programmable trajectory plot focusing on a few helices of interest to each user. The service can be accessed at http://kinefold.curie.fr/.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsComputer SimulationDNAInternetNucleic Acid ConformationRNASequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNAUser-Computer InterfaceDNARNA

Identifiers

PMID15980546
PMCPMC1160208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.