Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15980116›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2006

Array-CGH detection of micro rearrangements in mentally retarded individuals: clinical significance of imbalances present both in affected children and normal parents.

C Rosenberg, J Knijnenburg, E Bakker, A M Vianna-Morgante, W Sloos, P A Otto, M Kriek, K Hansson, A C V Krepischi-Santos, H Fiegler and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01043198 (Phenotypic Characterization and Array CGH Analysis in Patients With Syndromic Obesity of Unknown Etiology), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01043198 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Phenotypic Characterization and Array CGH Analysis in Patients With Syndromic Obesity of Unknown Etiology

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2010 to 2011Enrolled90ConditionsMental Retardation, Syndromic ObesityArmsClinical examination and blood sampling for biological and genetic analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 237 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Refining the Phenotype of Recurrent Rearrangements of Chromosome 16.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. 16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome Mice Display Sensory and Ultrasonic Vocalization Deficits During Social Interactions.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

C Rosenberg
J Knijnenburg
E Bakker
A M Vianna-Morgante
W Sloos
P A Otto
M Kriek
K Hansson
A C V Krepischi-Santos
H Fiegler
N P Carter
E K Bijlsma
A van Haeringen
K Szuhai
H J Tanke
Leiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversidade de São Paulo · BRWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe underlying causes of mental retardation remain unknown in about half the cases. Recent array-CGH studies demonstrated cryptic imbalances in about 25% of patients previously thought to be chromosomally normal. OBJECTIVE AND

methodsArray-CGH with approximately 3500 large insert clones spaced at approximately 1 Mb intervals was used to investigate DNA copy number changes in 81 mentally impaired individuals.

resultsImbalances never observed in control chromosomes were detected in 20 patients (25%): seven were de novo, nine were inherited, and four could not have their origin determined. Six other alterations detected by array were disregarded because they were shown by FISH either to hybridise to both homologues similarly in a presumptive deletion (one case) or to involve clones that hybridised to multiple sites (five cases). All de novo imbalances were assumed to be causally related to the abnormal phenotypes. Among the others, a causal relation between the rearrangements and an aberrant phenotype could be inferred in six cases, including two imbalances of the X chromosome, where the associated clinical features segregated as X linked recessive traits.

conclusionsIn all, 13 of 81 patients (16%) were found to have chromosomal imbalances probably related to their clinical features. The clinical significance of the seven remaining imbalances remains unclear. The limited ability to differentiate between inherited copy number variations which cause abnormal phenotypes and rare variants unrelated to clinical alterations currently constitutes a limitation in the use of CGH-microarray for guiding genetic counselling.

Indexed as

In Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceAllelic ImbalanceChildChromosomes, Human, Pair 2Gene RearrangementHumansIntellectual Disability

Identifiers

PMID15980116
PMCPMC2564641
OpenAlexW2111453238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.