SynthesisDrugs2005
Acellular pertussis vaccine safety and efficacy in children, adolescents and adults.
Synthesis in Drugs, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Safety of pertussis vaccination in pregnant women in UK: observational study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2014Observational
- Review
- Nonprotective responses to pediatric vaccines occur in children who are otitis prone.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2013Article
- Modelling the impact of extended vaccination strategies on the epidemiology of pertussis.Epidemiology and infection · 2012Article
- Update on available vaccines in India: report of the APPA VU 2010: I.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2011Article
- Cost-effectiveness of adolescent pertussis vaccination for the Netherlands: using an individual-based dynamic model.PloS one · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review offers a perspective on the acellular pertussis vaccine efficiency trials concluded in the 1990s and presents the main conclusions of a meta-analysis of 52 studies that assessed the safety and efficacy of the diphtheria-tetanus (DT)-whole cell pertussis (DTwP) and DT-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines administered to children. A clear serological correlate of immunity to pertussis following DTaP vaccination was not identified despite an intensive analysis. It can be speculated that this may be because various combinations of antibody to agglutinogens (pertussis toxin, filamentous haemagglutinin, pertactin and fimbriae) provide protection, or because serum antibody levels and responses do not uniformly reflect mucosal IgA antibody levels.Long-term efficacy following DTaP vaccination is becoming characterised and cell-mediated immunity (T-cell memory) may have importance. DTaP vaccination appears to establish herd immunity after sufficient uptake within communities and countries. As experience with DTaP vaccine safety has accumulated, a 1-2% occurrence of large, local injection reactions with all products has been defined for booster doses. The pathophysiological mechanisms for the reactions are not established but a majority appear likely to be IgE-mediated reactive oedema and a minority to be IgG-mediated reactive Arthus-type reactions. DTwP and DTaP combinations with other vaccines have been studied and licensed; the most controversial combination products are the DTaP/Haemophilus influenzae type B polysaccharide conjugate vaccines. Pertussis epidemiology is changing with a clear increase in occurrence in adolescents and adults. This development has spurred studies and licensure of safer DTaP vaccines for this older population. The economic impact of pertussis and transmission from adults to vulnerable infants provides a cost-benefit justification for widespread use of DTaP vaccines in all age groups with routine boosting every 10 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.