Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15977966›Full record

ReviewDrugs2005

Tigecycline: a novel glycylcycline.

Ethan Rubinstein, David Vaughan

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. OvercomingFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Risk Factors for Tigecycline-Associated Hypofibrinogenemia.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Efficacy of tigecycline vs. imipenem in the treatment of experimental Acinetobacter baumannii murine pneumonia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2010
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ethan RubinsteinSection of Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. erubins@yahoo.com
David Vaughan
University of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibacterials have been in clinical use for almost 60 years; however, the effectiveness of these valuable agents has been diminished by widespread emergence of bacterial resistance. Tigecycline is the first in a new class of glycylcyclines with activity against a wide range of clinically important pathogens. Tigecycline has demonstrated potent microbiological activity and excellent therapeutic response in animal infection models and in recently reported phase III human clinical trials. It is effective against intra-abdominal and skin and soft tissue infections caused by susceptible or multidrug-resistant staphylococci, enterococci or streptococci as well as most Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobic pathogens. In clinical trials nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events and were of a magnitude typical of those observed with tetracyclines in general. Additionally, tigecycline has proven to be efficacious in animal models of infection, including pneumonia, endocarditis and peritonitis. Tigecycline is only available as an intravenous agent and distributes extensively in tissues. Administration of a 100mg loading dose of tigecycline followed by twice-daily doses of 50mg yielded an apparent volume of distribution of 7-10 L/kg. Systemic clearance ranged from 0.2 to 0.3 L/h/kg and its half-life varied from 37 to 67 hours. The pharmacokinetics of tigecycline appear unaffected by sex, age, renal disease or the presence of food. Data from animal studies would suggest that time above the minimum inhibitory concentration is the pharmacodynamic factor that best correlates with bacterial eradication. The efficacy, safety profile and pharmacodynamic attributes of tigecycline support its continuing clinical development as empirical parenteral treatment of challenging nosocomial and community-acquired infections, including those caused by proven or suspected resistant pathogens.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChemistry, PharmaceuticalClinical Trials as TopicHumansMinocyclineMolecular StructureTetracyclinesTigecyclineAnti-Bacterial AgentsCL 331002MinocyclineTetracyclinesTigecycline

Identifiers

PMID15977966
OpenAlexW1972606475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.