SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005
Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04886791 (Vaginal Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 85 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Vaginal Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy (VANH): a Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 434 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Preoperative Misoprostol to Reduce Blood Loss and Related Morbidities During Abdominal Hysterectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 10 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023Pooled it
- The real experience with women's hysterectomy: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research evidence.Nursing open · 2023Pooled it
- Morbidity after surgical management of cervical cancer in low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2016Pooled it
- Medical Therapies for Uterine Fibroids - A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Hysterectomy versus hysterectomy plus oophorectomy for premenopausal women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Article
- Learning curve and perioperative outcomes of four-port assistant-independent robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy according to uterine size.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Hysterectomy and Urinary Incontinence in Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from the Ardakan Cohort Study on Aging.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Effect of adhesions on laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy outcome: a 10-year retrospective, comparative study of 1683 consecutive cases.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Socioeconomic differentials in the association between hysterectomy and hypertension among women in Maharashtra.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Article
- Intraoperative cystoscopy for urinary tract complications during robotic gynecological hysterectomy surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Bupivacaine Injection in Vaginal Vault and Paracervical Region Versus Vaginal Vault Infiltration with Bupivacaine After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025Article
- Effect of bilateral uterine artery ligation on blood loss during total laparoscopic hysterectomy.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Charting Proficiency: The Learning Curve in Robotic Hysterectomy for Large Uteri Exceeding 1000 g.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the most appropriate surgical method of hysterectomy (abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic) for women with benign disease.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, and Biological Abstracts. SELECTION OF STUDIES: Only randomised controlled trials were selected; participants had to have benign gynaecological disease; interventions had to comprise at least one hysterectomy method compared with another; and trials had to report primary outcomes (time taken to return to normal activities, intraoperative visceral injury, and major long term complications) or secondary outcomes (operating time, other immediate complications of surgery, short term complications, and duration of hospital stay).
results27 trials (total of 3643 participants) were included. Return to normal activities was quicker after vaginal than after abdominal hysterectomy (weighted mean difference 9.5 (95% confidence interval 6.4 to 12.6) days) and after laparoscopic than after abdominal hysterectomy (difference 13.6 (11.8 to 15.4) days), but was not significantly different for laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy (difference -1.1 (-4.2 to 2.1) days). There were more urinary tract injuries with laparoscopic than with abdominal hysterectomy (odds ratio 2.61 (95% confidence interval 1.22 to 5.60)), but no other intraoperative visceral injuries showed a significant difference between surgical approaches. Data were notably absent for many important long term patient outcome measures, where the analyses were underpowered to detect important differences, or they were simply not reported in trials.
conclusionsSignificantly speedier return to normal activities and other improved secondary outcomes (shorter duration of hospital stay and fewer unspecified infections or febrile episodes) suggest that vaginal hysterectomy is preferable to abdominal hysterectomy where possible. Where vaginal hysterectomy is not possible, laparoscopic hysterectomy is preferable to abdominal hysterectomy, although it brings a higher chance of bladder or ureter injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.