Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15975325›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2005

Statins and stroke prevention.

Hashem M Shaltoni, Frank M Yatsu, David C Hess

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hashem M ShaltoniDepartment of Neurology, The University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Frank M Yatsu
David C Hess
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data from studies on the benefits of statins in coronary artery disease patients in preventing recurrent primary and secondary cardiac endpoints, as well as ischemic strokes, imply the potential value of statins in recurrent ischemic stroke prevention without coronary artery disease symptoms or, by extension, primary ischemic stroke prevention. However, data on the latter are lacking, although the ongoing Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) study is designed to answer that question. Until these data become available, clinicians are justified in using statins to avert recurrent ischemic strokes due to atherosclerosis, especially if elevated total cholesterol, increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and/or reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, as specified in the National Cholesterol Education Program Third Adult Treatment Panel, are present. This article reviews the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, particularly the major components of atheromas of cholesterol, smooth muscle cells, inflammation, "foam cells," and connective tissue elements. Emphasis is placed on the first three and the results of statin trials in coronary artery disease, as well as the beneficial pleiotrophic effects of statins in ischemic strokes.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsStrokeHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID15975325
OpenAlexW2009767060

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.