Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15970065›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005

Antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies in primary care: a whole system participatory action research project.

Paul Thomas, Lola Oni, Mabel Alli, Judith St Hilaire, Alma Smith, Conan Leavey, Ricky Banarsee

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Delay between pregnancy confirmation and sickle cell and [corrected] thalassaemia screening: a population-based cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  6. Screening for haemoglobinopathies in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
  7. Haemoglobinopathy screening: an end to institutional racism?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul ThomasThames Valley University and Brent Teaching Primary Care Trust, London. paul.thomas@tvu.ac.uk
Lola Oni
Mabel Alli
Judith St Hilaire
Alma Smith
Conan Leavey
Ricky Banarsee
University of West London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe usual system for antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies permits termination only late in the second trimester of pregnancy.

aimTo evaluate a system where pregnant women are screened in general practice, and to develop a model of care pathway or whole system research able to bring into view unexpected effects of health service innovation. DESIGN OF STUDY: A whole system participatory action research approach was used. Six purposefully chosen general practices screened women who attended with a new pregnancy. Data of gestational age of screening were compared with two control groups. Qualitative data were gathered through workshops, interviews and feedback to the project steering group. At facilitated annual workshops participants from all parts of the care pathway produced a consensus about the meaning of the data as a whole.

settingSix general practices in north London.

methodA whole system participatory action research approach allowed stakeholders from throughout the care pathway to pilot the innovation and reflect on the meaning and significance of quantitative and qualitative data.

resultsThe gestational age of screening in general practice was 4.1 weeks earlier (95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.41 to 4.68) than in hospital clinics (P<0.001), and 2.9 weeks earlier (95% CI = 2.07 to 3.65) than in community midwife clinics (P <0.001). However, only 35% of pregnant women in the study were screened in the practices. Changes required throughout the whole care pathway make wider implementation more difficult than at first realised. The cost within general practice is greater than initially appreciated owing to a perceived need to provide counselling about other issues at the same time. Practitioners considered that other ways of early screening should be explored, including preconceptual screening. The research approach was able to bring into view unexpected effects of the innovation, but health workers were unfamiliar with the participatory processes.

conclusionAntenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies in general practice lowers the gestational age at which an at-risk pregnancy can be identified. However, widespread implementation of such screening may be too difficult.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellFamily PracticeFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLondonPregnancyPregnancy Complications, HematologicPregnancy Trimester, FirstPrenatal DiagnosisProgram EvaluationThalassemia

Identifiers

PMID15970065
PMCPMC1472735
OpenAlexW2162380432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.