ArticleBMC gastroenterology2005
Clinical presentation of abdominal tuberculosis in HIV seronegative adults.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Six-month therapy for abdominal tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Obstructive jaundice caused by an abdominal tuberculous mass lesion.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Intestinal Tuberculosis Presenting with Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patient on Warfarin Therapy.Case reports in gastrointestinal medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical features and outcomes of abdominal tuberculosis in southeastern Korea: 12 years of experience.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Ileocecal, colonic, and peritoneal tuberculosis: role of imaging in diagnosis. A case report and literature review.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2014Article
- Clinicopathological profile and surgical treatment of abdominal tuberculosis: a single centre experience in northwestern Tanzania.BMC infectious diseases · 2013Article
- Diagnostic dilemma of abdominopelvic tuberculosis:a series of 20 cases.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2010Article
- Diagnostic dilemma of abdominal tuberculosis in non-HIV patients: an ongoing challenge for physicians.World journal of gastroenterology · 2006Article
- The role of laboratory investigations in evaluating abdominal tuberculosis.Journal of family & community medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe accurate diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis usually takes a long time and requires a high index of suspicion in clinic practice. Eighty-eight immune-competent patients with abdominal tuberculosis were grouped according to symptoms at presentation and followed prospectively in order to investigate the effect of symptomatic presentation on clinical diagnosis and prognosis.
methodsBased upon the clinical presentation, the patients were divided into groups such as non-specific abdominal pain & less prominent in bowel habit, ascites, alteration in bowel habit, acute abdomen and others. Demographic, clinical and laboratory features, coexistence of pulmonary tuberculosis, diagnostic procedures, definitive diagnostic tests, need for surgical therapy, and response to treatment were assessed in each group.
resultsAccording to clinical presentation, five groups were constituted as non-specific abdominal pain (n = 24), ascites (n = 24), bowel habit alteration (n = 22), acute abdomen (n = 9) and others (n = 9). Patients presenting with acute abdomen had significantly higher white blood cell counts (p = 0.002) and abnormalities in abdominal plain radiographs (p = 0.014). Patients presenting with alteration in bowel habit were younger (p = 0.048). The frequency of colonoscopic abnormalities (7.5%), and need for therapeutic surgery (12.5%) were lower in patients with ascites, (p = 0.04) and (p = 0.001), respectively. There was no difference in gender, disease duration, diagnostic modalities, response to treatment, period to initial response, and mortality between groups (p > 0.05). Gastrointestinal tract alone was the most frequently involved part (38.5%), and this was associated with acid-fast bacteria in the sputum (p = 0.003).
conclusionGastrointestinal tract involvement is frequent in patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis. Although different clinical presentations of patients with abdominal tuberculosis determine diagnostic work up and need for therapeutic surgery, evidence based diagnosis and consequences of the disease does not change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.