ArticleJournal of structural and functional genomics2005
Pilot studies on the parallel production of soluble mouse proteins in a bacterial expression system.
Article in Journal of structural and functional genomics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MARINE-EXPRESS: taking advantage of high throughput cloning and expression strategies for the post-genomic analysis of marine organisms.Microbial cell factories · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the parallel production in medium throughput of mouse proteins, using protocols that involved recombinatorial cloning, protein expression screening and batch purification. The methods were scaled up to allow the simultaneous processing of tens or hundreds of protein samples. Scale-up was achieved in two stages. In an initial study, 30 targets were processed manually but with common protocols for all targets. In the second study, these protocols were applied to 96 target proteins that were processed in an automated manner. The success rates at each stage of the study were similar for both the manual and automated approaches. Overall, 15 of the selected 126 target mouse genes (12%) yielded soluble protein products in a bacterial expression system. This success rate compares favourably with other protein screening projects, particularly for eukaryotic proteins, and could be further improved by modifications at the cloning step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15965734What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.