Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15965264›Full record

ArticleGenetics2005

Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea.

Ana Llopart, Daniel Lachaise, Jerry A Coyne

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Muller "Elements" inGenetics · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Effect of Temperature onG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana LlopartDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. ana-llopart@uiowa.edu
Daniel Lachaise
Jerry A Coyne

Funding

GENETIC BASIS OF SPECIES DIFFERENCES IN DROSOPHILAR01GM058260 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI COYNE, JERRY ALLEN · 1998 to 2009
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM58260NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila yakuba is widely distributed in sub-Saharan Africa, while D. santomea is endemic to the volcanic island of São Tomé in the Atlantic Ocean, 280 km west of Gabon. On São Tomé, D. yakuba is found mainly in open lowland forests, and D. santomea is restricted to the wet misty forests at higher elevations. At intermediate elevations, the species form a hybrid zone where hybrids occur at a frequency of approximately 1%. To determine the extent of gene flow between these species we studied polymorphism and divergence patterns in 29 regions distributed throughout the genome, including mtDNA and three genes on the Y chromosome. This multilocus approach, together with the comparison to the two allopatric species D. mauritiana and D. sechellia, allowed us to distinguish between forces that should affect all genes and forces that should act on some genes (e.g., introgression). Our results show that D. yakuba mtDNA has replaced that of D. santomea and that there is also significant introgression for two nuclear genes, yellow and salr. The majority of genes, however, has remained distinct. These two species therefore do not form a "hybrid swarm" in which much of the genome shows substantial introgression while disruptive selection maintains distinctness for only a few traits (e.g., pigmentation and male genitalia).

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosome MappingDNADNA, MitochondrialDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGenes, InsectGenetic VariationGene Transfer, HorizontalMaleModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityDNADNA, MitochondrialDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15965264
PMCPMC1456511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.