Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15965196›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2005

Qualitative neuropsychological performance characteristics in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

J C Thompson, C L Stopford, J S Snowden, D Neary

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 252 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meta-analytic Review of Memory Impairment in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Frontotemporal Dementia, Where Do We Stand? A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cognitive and behavioural inhibition deficits in neurodegenerative dementias.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Analyzing theory of mind impairment in patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Examining the language and behavioural profile in FTD and ALS-FTD.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J C ThompsonCerebral Function Unit, Greater Manchester Neuroscience Centre, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8HD, UK. jennifer.thompson@manchester.ac.uk
C L Stopford
J S Snowden
D Neary
Salford Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer's disease are clinically distinct disorders, yet neuropsychological studies have had variable success in distinguishing them. A possible reason is that studies typically rely on overall accuracy scores, which may obscure differences in reasons for failure.

objectivesTo explore the hypothesis that analysis of qualitative performance characteristics and error types, in addition to overall numerical scores, would enhance the neuropsychological distinction between FTD and Alzheimer's disease.

methods38 patients with FTD and 73 with Alzheimer's disease underwent assessment of language, visuospatial abilities, memory, and executive function, using a neuropsychological screening instrument and standard neuropsychological tests. In each of these cognitive domains, performance characteristics and error types were documented, in addition to numerical scores on tests.

resultsWhereas comparison of neuropsychological test scores revealed some group differences, these did not occur consistently across tests within cognitive domains. However, analysis of performance characteristics and error types revealed qualitative differences between the two groups. In particular, FTD patients displayed features associated with frontal lobe dysfunction, such as concrete thought, perseveration, confabulation, and poor organisation, which disrupted performance across the range of neuropsychological tests.

conclusionsNumerical scores on neuropsychological tests alone are of limited value in differentiating FTD and Alzheimer's disease, but performance characteristics and error types enhance the distinction between the two disorders. FTD is associated with a profound behavioural syndrome that affects performance on cognitive assessment, obscuring group differences. Qualitative information should be included in neuropsychological research and clinical assessments.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseDementiaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMental Status ScheduleMiddle AgedNeurologic ExaminationNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID15965196
PMCPMC1739700
OpenAlexW2076261058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.