Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15963002›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2005

Thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: a guide to patient selection.

Richard I Lindley

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard I LindleyWestern Clinical School, Moran Foundation for Older Australians, University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia. Richardl@westgate.wh.usyd.edu.au
Westmead Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thrombolysis should be a routine treatment for selected patients with acute ischaemic stroke and shows promise in a much larger group of patients. This recommendation is based on data from two completed meta-analyses: the Cochrane Library and the rt-PA Study Group individual patient meta-analysis. In patients with ischaemic stroke, treatment with alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; rt-PA) is associated with a non-significant excess of deaths, equivalent to about 19 extra deaths per 1000 treated. Furthermore, thrombolysis, regardless of which drug is used, definitely increases the odds of fatal intracranial haemorrhage by 4-fold. However, despite these risks, thrombolysis with alteplase reduces the odds of death or disability, with the benefit being equivalent to about 55 extra independent survivors per 1000 treated. Unfortunately, there are currently too few data to provide a comprehensive guide to patient selection. The available data suggest that younger patients (<80 years of age) who can be treated with alteplase within 3 hours of stroke onset have the most to gain, equivalent to about 100 more independent survivors per 1000 treated. The role of thrombolysis beyond 3 hours, in those with more extensive CT scan ischaemic change, and patients >80 years of age needs further evaluation. In summary, thrombolysis with alteplase is now an established treatment for acute ischaemic stroke, but clinicians need to cooperate in terms of enrolling more patients in further trials if we are to get the most out of this important treatment.

Indexed as

Thrombolytic TherapyDrug Administration RoutesFibrinolysisFibrinolytic AgentsHumansIndividualityIschemiaNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Patient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicStrokeTime FactorsUnited StatesFibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

PMID15963002
OpenAlexW2031527255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.