Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15962506›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular neurobiology2005

Dynamics of CNS barriers: evolution, differentiation, and modulation.

N Joan Abbott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Nanomedicine: A New Frontier in Alzheimer's Disease Drug Targeting.Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Levodopa-induced dyskinesia: brain iron deposition as a new hypothesis.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

N Joan AbbottBlood-Brain Barrier Group, Wolfson Centre for Age Related Diseases, King's College University of London, London, UK. joan.abbott@kcl.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Three main barrier layers at the interface between blood and tissue protect the central nervous system (CNS): the endothelium of brain capillaries, and the epithelia of the choroid plexus (CP) and the arachnoid. The classical work on these barriers in situ until the 1970s laid the foundations for modern understanding. Techniques for brain endothelial cell isolation and culture pioneered by Ferenc Joó in the 1970s opened up new fields of examination, enabling study of mechanisms at the cellular and molecular level. (2) Astrocytic glial cells are closely associated with the brain endothelial barrier. During evolution the barrier appears to have shifted from the glial to the endothelial layer, in parallel with the increasing importance of the microvasculature and its regulation. Vestiges of the barrier potential of glia remain in the modern mammalian CNS. (3) Evolutionary evidence suggests that the advantage derived from ionic homeostasis around central synapses was the major selective pressure leading to refinement of CNS barrier systems. This is one element of the modern 'multitasking' barrier function. (4) While epithelia are constitutively able to form barriers at appropriate interfaces, the 'default' condition for endothelia is more leaky; inductive influences from associated cells especially astrocytes are important in generating the full blood-brain barrier (BBB) phenotype in brain capillaries. The underlying mechanisms are being elucidated at the molecular and genomics level. (5) The barrier layers of the nervous system can be modulated by a number of receptor-mediated processes, involving several signal transduction pathways, both calcium dependent and independent. Some agents acting as 'inducers' in the long term can act as 'modulators' in the short-term, with some overlap of signaling pathways. Modulating agents may be derived both from the blood and from cells associated with cerebral vessels. Less is known about the modulation of the CP. (6) The challenge for the next era of CNS barrier studies will be to apply new knowledge from proteomics and genomics to understanding the in vivo condition in physiology and pathology.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsAstrocytesBlood-Brain BarrierCell DifferentiationEndothelial CellsHumansSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID15962506
PMCPMC11529509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.