Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15960063›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2005

APN-physician collaboration in caring for women with high-risk pregnancies.

Dorothy Brooten, JoAnne Youngblut, Kathleen Blais, Deborah Donahue, Ivette Cruz, Michelle Lightbourne

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dorothy BrootenFlorida International University, School of Nursing, 3000 NE 151st St., AC II Rm 230, North Miami, FL 33181, USA. Brooten@fiu.edu
JoAnne Youngblut
Kathleen Blais
Deborah Donahue
Ivette Cruz
Michelle Lightbourne
Alpha-1 Foundation · USBaptist Health System · USBrookwood Baptist Health · USFlorida International University · US

Funding

NURSE HOME CARE-HIGH RISK PREGNANT WOMENR01NR002867 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BROOTEN, DOROTHY · 1991 to 1995
–
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR002867NINR NIH HHS R01 NR02897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine: (a) frequency and focus of APN-physician collaborations in a clinical trial in which half of physician prenatal care for women with high-risk pregnancies was substituted with APN prenatal care delivered in women's homes; and (b) characteristics of women requiring greater numbers of collaborations. DESIGN AND

methodsDescriptive study with secondary analysis of data from 83 of the original trial's 85 intervention participants followed by APNs prenatally through 8 weeks postpartum. APN practices, recorded in logs, included APN interactions with the women and the physician, and type of APN contact (e.g., home visit, telephone call). Each APN-physician collaboration was coded for type, timing, and focus.

findingsTotal number of APN-physician collaboration contacts was 351, with a mean of 4.5 and a range of 1 to 16 per woman. Focus of collaborations was: status updates (59%), new physical findings (21%), change in treatment (8%), patient concerns (7%) and medication adjustment (5%). No significant differences in numbers of collaborations were found according to age, primary diagnosis, marital status, type of health insurance, race, or income. Women with high school education received more collaborations than did those not completing high school or those with some postsecondary education. Prenatally, women with a first pregnancy required more collaborations than did multipara participants.

conclusionsMost APN-physician collaborative contacts were focused on monitoring women's physical and emotional status and discussing new physical findings. These collaborations were important in the original trial's successful pregnancy and infant outcomes and savings in health care dollars.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorPhysician-Nurse RelationsPregnancy, High-RiskAdultCommunicationEducational StatusEmpathyFemaleHumansModels, NursingNurse CliniciansNurse's RoleNursing AssessmentNursing Evaluation ResearchNursing Methodology ResearchOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID15960063
PMCPMC3544940
OpenAlexW2166820042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.