Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15958489›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2005

Cell cycle-dependent dynamics and regulation of mitotic kinesins in Drosophila S2 cells.

Gohta Goshima, Ronald D Vale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanism and regulation of kinesin motors.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025
    Review
  5. The dynamic duo of microtubule polymerase Mini spindles/XMAP215 and cytoplasmic dynein is essential for maintainingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mud binds the kinesin-14 Ncd inBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Bioenergetics of theBiomolecules · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Proximity labeling reveals novel interactomes in liveDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gohta GoshimaThe Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA.
Ronald D Vale
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

MICROTUBULE-BASED ORGANELLE TRANSPORTR01GM038499 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI VALE, RONALD D · 1988 to 2005
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constructing a mitotic spindle requires the coordinated actions of several kinesin motor proteins. Here, we have visualized the dynamics of five green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged mitotic kinesins (class 5, 6, 8, 13, and 14) in live Drosophila Schneider cell line (S2), after first demonstrating that the GFP-tag does not interfere with the mitotic functions of these kinesins using an RNA interference (RNAi)-based rescue strategy. Class 8 (Klp67A) and class 14 (Ncd) kinesin are sequestered in an active form in the nucleus during interphase and engage their microtubule targets upon nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB). Relocalization of Klp67A to the cytoplasm using a nuclear export signal resulted in the disassembly of the interphase microtubule array, providing support for the hypothesis that this kinesin class possesses microtubule-destabilizing activity. The interactions of Kinesin-5 (Klp61F) and -6 (Pavarotti) with microtubules, on the other hand, are activated and inactivated by Cdc2 phosphorylation, respectively, as shown by examining localization after mutating Cdc2 consensus sites. The actions of microtubule-destabilizing kinesins (class 8 and 13 [Klp10A]) seem to be controlled by cell cycle-dependent changes in their localizations. Klp10A, concentrated on microtubule plus ends in interphase and prophase, relocalizes to centromeres and spindle poles upon NEB and remains at these sites throughout anaphase. Consistent with this localization, RNAi analysis showed that this kinesin contributes to chromosome-to-pole movement during anaphase A. Klp67A also becomes kinetochore associated upon NEB, but the majority of the population relocalizes to the central spindle by the timing of anaphase A onset, consistent with our RNAi result showing no effect of depleting this motor on anaphase A. These results reveal a diverse spectrum of regulatory mechanisms for controlling the localization and function of five mitotic kinesins at different stages of the cell cycle.

Indexed as

Cell CycleMitosisActive Transport, Cell NucleusAnimalsCDC2 Protein KinaseCell LineDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGenes, ReporterKinesinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesCDC2 Protein KinaseDrosophila ProteinsKinesinsKLP10A protein, DrosophilaKlp61F protein, DrosophilaKLP67A protein, DrosophilaMicrotubule-Associated Proteinsncd protein, Drosophilapav protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID15958489
PMCPMC1182325
OpenAlexW2124595210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.