Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15956964›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2005

p53 status and response to radiotherapy in rectal cancer: a prospective multilevel analysis.

E Lopez-Crapez, F Bibeau, S Thézenas, M Ychou, J Simony-Lafontaine, A Thirion, D Azria, J Grenier, P Senesse

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00855946 (Proteomic Approach Using Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Tandem Time-of-flight), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00855946 completednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

Proteomic Approach Using Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Tandem Time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF) of Tumor Response in Rectal Carcinoma After Radiochemotherapy

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2009 to 2012Enrolled46ConditionsRectal Adenocarcinoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Mechanism of Ferroptosis and Its Role in Disease Development.International journal of biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Are there predictors that can determine neoadjuvant treatment responses in rectal cancer?The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. On biomarkers and pathways in rectal cancer: What's the target?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E Lopez-CrapezCancer Research Center, Val d'Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier 34298, France. ecrapez@valdorel.fnclcc.fr
F Bibeau
S Thézenas
M Ychou
J Simony-Lafontaine
A Thirion
D Azria
J Grenier
P Senesse
Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRCEA Valduc · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate, in a prospective study, the predictive role of p53 status analysed at four different levels in identifying the response to preoperative radiotherapy in rectal adenocarcinoma. Before treatment, 70 patients were staged and endoscopic forceps biopsies from the tumour area were taken. p53 status was assessed by total cDNA sequencing, allelic loss analysis, immunohistochemistry, and p53 antibodies. Neoadjuvant treatment was based on preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. Response to therapy was evaluated after surgery by both pathologic downstaging and histologic tumour regression grade. In all, 35 patients (50.0%) had p53 gene mutations; 44.4% of patients had an allelic loss; nuclear p53 overexpression was observed in 39 patients (55.7%); and p53 antibodies were detected in 11 patients (16.7%). In the multilevel analysis of p53 status, gene mutations correlated with both nuclear protein overexpression (P < 0.0001) and loss of heterozygosity (P = 0.013). In all, 29 patients (41.4%) were downstaged by pathologic analysis, and 19 patients (29.2%) were classified as tumour regression grade 1. Whatever the method of evaluation of treatment response, no correlation between p53 alterations and response to radiotherapy was observed. Our results do not support the use of p53 alterations alone as a predictive marker for response to radiotherapy in rectal carcinoma.

Indexed as

Genes, p53AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorColectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID15956964
PMCPMC2361816
OpenAlexW2054109203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.