Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15956369›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Comparison of qualitative (COBAS AMPLICOR HCV 2.0 versus VERSANT HCV RNA) and quantitative (COBAS AMPLICOR HCV monitor 2.0 versus VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0) assays for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA detection and quantification: impact on diagnosis and treatment of HCV infections.

Isabelle Desombere, Hans Van Vlierberghe, Sibyl Couvent, Filip Clinckspoor, Geert Leroux-Roels

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Occult Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Review.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2018
    Review
  2. Update on hepatitis B and C virus diagnosis.World journal of virology · 2015
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Frequent longitudinal sampling of hepatitis C virus infection in injection drug users reveals intermittently detectable viremia and reinfection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2013
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabelle DesombereDepartment of Clinical Biology, Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University and Hospital, De Pintelaan, 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Isabelle.desombere@ugent.be
Hans Van Vlierberghe
Sibyl Couvent
Filip Clinckspoor
Geert Leroux-Roels
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative measurements of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA are becoming increasingly important in the management of HCV-infected patients. Here we compared two quantitative assays, the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV Monitor 2.0 assay (Roche Diagnostics) and the branched DNA-based VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay (Bayer Diagnostics) for HCV RNA measurement in 344 samples derived from 120 patients with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection. The overall concordance between the results of the two tests was 95%, and the HCV RNA titers within the dynamic ranges of the assays correlated very well (r2=0.86). Furthermore, both tests performed equally well in determining an early viral response at week 1 or 4 during antiviral therapy. We also compared two qualitative HCV RNA detection assays: the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV 2.0 assay versus the transcription-mediated amplification (TMA)-based VERSANT HCV RNA qualitative assay. Stored samples from sustained responders to interferon-ribavirin therapy were retested by the HCV TMA assay and were found to contain no detectable HCV RNA, demonstrating complete concordance between the results of PCR and TMA. However, HCV RNA was detected by the TMA assay in end-of-treatment (ETR) samples from 33% of patients with relapses who were HCV RNA negative according to the COBAS AMPLICOR assay. This observation suggests that a TMA assay can lead to a more correct definition of the ETR response.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticAdultAntiviral AgentsBranched DNA Signal Amplification AssayFemaleHepacivirusHepatitis C, ChronicHumansMaleMiddle AgedNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesRNA, ViralViral LoadAntiviral AgentsReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID15956369
PMCPMC1151897
OpenAlexW2023599537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.