Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15956365›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Use of the INNO-LiPA-MYCOBACTERIA assay (version 2) for identification of Mycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare-Mycobacterium scrofulaceum complex isolates.

Léa Lebrun, François-Xavier Weill, Leila Lafendi, Florence Houriez, François Casanova, M Cristina Gutierrez, Didier Ingrand, Philippe Lagrange, Véronique Vincent, Jean Louis Herrmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Update on Global Tuberculosis (TB).Infectious diseases · 2013
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of INNO-LiPA mycobacteria v2 assay for identification of rapidly growing mycobacteria.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Lymphadenopathy caused by Mycobacterium colombiense.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2008
    Article
  14. Mycobacterium avium in the postgenomic era.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2007
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Léa LebrunService de Microbiologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.
François-Xavier Weill
Leila Lafendi
Florence Houriez
François Casanova
M Cristina Gutierrez
Didier Ingrand
Philippe Lagrange
Véronique Vincent
Jean Louis Herrmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using INNO-LiPA-MYCOBACTERIA (Lipav1; Innogenetics) and the AccuProbe (Gen-Probe Inc./bioMérieux) techniques, 35 Mycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare-Mycobacterium scrofulaceum (MAC/MAIS) complex strains were identified between January 2000 and December 2002. Thirty-four of 35 isolates were positive only for the MAIS complex probe by Lipav1 and were further analyzed by INNO-LiPA-MYCOBACTERIA version 2 (Lipav2), hsp65 PCR restriction pattern analysis (PRA), and ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS), hsp65, and 16S rRNA sequences. Lipav2 identified 14 of 34 strains at the species level, including 11 isolates positive for the newly specific MAC sequevar Mac-A probe (MIN-2 probe). Ten of these 11 isolates corresponded to sequevar Mac-A, which was recently defined as Mycobacterium chimerae sp. nov. Among the last 20 of the 34 MAIS isolates, 17 (by hsp65 PRA) and 18 (by hsp65 sequence) were characterized as M. avium. Ten of the 20 were identified as Mac-U sequevar. All these 20 isolates were identified as M. intracellulare by 16S rRNA sequence except one isolate identified as Mycobacterium paraffinicum by 16S rRNA and ITS sequencing. One isolate out of 35 isolates that was positive for M. avium by AccuProbe and that was Mycobacterium genus probe positive and MAIS probe negative by Lipav1 and Lipav2 might be considered a new species. In conclusion, the new INNO-LiPA-MYCOBACTERIA allowed the identification of 40% of the previously unidentified MAIS isolates at the species level. The results of the Lipav2 assay on the MAIS isolates confirm the great heterogeneity of this group and suggest the use of hsp65 or ITS sequencing for precise identification of such isolates.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsChaperonin 60ChaperoninsDNA ProbesHumansMolecular Sequence DataMycobacterium avium ComplexMycobacterium InfectionsMycobacterium scrofulaceumNucleic Acid HybridizationPolymerase Chain ReactionReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityBacterial ProteinsChaperonin 60ChaperoninsDNA Probesheat-shock protein 65, MycobacteriumReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID15956365
PMCPMC1151901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.