Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15952014›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2005

[In vitro stratified urothelium and its relevance in reconstructive urology].

S Maurer, G Feil, A Stenzl

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S MaurerLabor für Tissue Engineering, Klinik für Urologie, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen. sabine.maurer@med.uni-tuebingen.de
G Feil
A Stenzl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are two main objectives regarding tissue engineering in reconstructive urology: (1) to provide the surgeon with autologous tissue for urogenital reconstructive purposes and (2) to create the framework for experimental investigations to better understand the structure and function of the tissues involved. In the last years urothelial cell culture has become a routine laboratory technique. There is sufficient cellular output after isolation and propagation to seed cells as single cell suspensions on biodegradable matrices for the construction of cell-matrix implants. In recent publications attention was directed toward using established primary cell cultures for in vitro stratification of multilayered urothelial sheets. Urothelial sheets have been used quite successfully for covering acellular matrices for bladder augmentation in dog and minipig models. However, up to now there has been no clinical application in humans of urothelial sheets generated in vitro. Here we review facts about the different strategies for generating multilayered urothelial sheets.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesHumansPlastic Surgery ProceduresTissue EngineeringUrologic DiseasesUrologic Surgical ProceduresUrothelium

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.