Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15951963›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2005

A comparison of the phenotype and genotype in adenomatous polyposis patients with and without a family history.

Brindusa Truta, Brian A Allen, Peggy G Conrad, Vivian Weinberg, Glenn A Miller, Rob Pomponio, Lara R Lipton, Germano Guerra, Ian P M Tomlinson, Marvin H Sleisenger and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Genes · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brindusa TrutaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, 2330 Post Street, San Francisco, CA 94115-1623, USA.
Brian A Allen
Peggy G Conrad
Vivian Weinberg
Glenn A Miller
Rob Pomponio
Lara R Lipton
Germano Guerra
Ian P M Tomlinson
Marvin H Sleisenger
Young S Kim
Jonathan P Terdiman
San Francisco VA Medical Center · USUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdenomatous polyposis of the colon is often secondary to an inherited mutation in adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene, however, approximately one third of patients have no family history of the disease. We studied the phenotype and genotype of adenomatous polyposis in patients without a family history.

methodsA cohort of 57 unrelated adenomatous polyposis patients were evaluated. Seventeen patients with no family history were compared with 40 patients who had a positive family history of the disease. Family history and medical records were collected and analyzed. Germline APC and Mut Y homologue (MYH) testing was undertaken.

resultsPatients without a family history were diagnosed with polyposis at an older age (41 years vs. 32 years) and presenting more frequently with symptoms (76 vs 20, P < 0.05). The number of colonic polyps and frequency of extracolonic manifestation associated with adenomatous polyposis did not differ between the two groups. APC mutations were detected less frequently among patients without a family history of the disease (4 out of 17 vs 25 out of 40, P=0.007), even among those with greater than 100 colorectal adenomas (4 out of 12 versus 21 out of 29, P=0.03). One homozygous MYH mutation carrier (G382D) was detected among the six patients without a family history and without a germline APC mutation who were tested.

conclusionsAdenomatous polyposis patients without a family history are usually diagnosed with symptoms, and at a later age. Phenotypically, they are similar to those with a family history. However, germline APC mutations are detected far less frequently in patients without a family history. A small percentage of these cases may be secondary to biallelic germline MYH mutations.

Indexed as

Genes, APCGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdenomatous Polyposis ColiAdultAge of OnsetDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenotypeGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPedigreePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID15951963
OpenAlexW2002156188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.