Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15951542›Full record

Trial reportGut2005

Combined oral and enema treatment with Pentasa (mesalazine) is superior to oral therapy alone in patients with extensive mild/moderate active ulcerative colitis: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study.

P Marteau, C S Probert, S Lindgren, M Gassul, T G Tan, A Dignass, R Befrits, G Midhagen, J Rademaker, M Foldager

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 364 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Saudi consensus guidance for the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Ulcerative Colitis-Diagnostic and Therapeutic Algorithms.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A practical approach to positioning therapies in ulcerative colitis.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Endoplasmic Reticular Stress and Pathogenesis of Experimental Colitis: Mechanism of Action of 5-Amino Salicylic Acid.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

P MarteauGastroenterology, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75908 Paris cedex 15, France. philippe.marteau@hop.egp.ap-hop-paris.fr
C S Probert
S Lindgren
M Gassul
T G Tan
A Dignass
R Befrits
G Midhagen
J Rademaker
M Foldager
Bristol Royal Infirmary · GBCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEConquest Hospital · GBFerring Pharmaceuticals (Denmark) · DKHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESKarolinska University Hospital · SEMalmö University · SESkaraborg Hospital · SEZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsOral aminosalicylates are well established in the treatment of active mild/moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) when the disease is extensive (that is, beyond the splenic flexure). The majority of clinical symptoms relate to disease activity in the distal part of the colon and therefore this study was designed to investigate if adding a mesalazine enema to oral mesalazine has additional benefit for patients with extensive mild/moderate active UC.

methodsA randomised double blind study was performed in 127 ambulatory patients. All received 4 g/day (twice daily dosing) oral mesalazine for eight weeks. During the initial four weeks, they additionally received an enema at bedtime containing 1 g of mesalazine or placebo. Disease activity was assessed using the ulcerative colitis disease activity index, with clinical and endoscopic signs at four and eight weeks.

resultsRemission was obtained in 44% (95% confidence interval (CI) 31%, 58%) of the mesalazine enema group (Me) and in 34% (95% CI 21%, 49%) of the placebo enema group (Pl) at four weeks (p = 0.31) and in 64% (95% CI 50%, 76%) of the Me group versus 43% (95% CI 28%, 58%) of the Pl group at eight weeks (p = 0.03). Improvement was obtained in 89% (95% CI 78%, 96%) of the Me group versus 62% (95% CI 46%, 75%) of the Pl group at four weeks (p = 0.0008) and in 86% (95% CI 75%, 94%) of the Me group versus 68% (95% CI 53%, 81%) of the Pl group at eight weeks (p = 0.026).

conclusionIn patients with extensive mild/moderate active UC, the combination therapy is superior to oral therapy. It is safe, well accepted, and may be regarded as firstline treatment.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdministration, RectalAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalColitis, UlcerativeDouble-Blind MethodEnemaFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansMaleMesalamineMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalMesalamine

Identifiers

PMID15951542
PMCPMC1774619
OpenAlexW2112273094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.