ArticleInternational journal for parasitology2005
In vivo imaging of tissue eosinophilia and eosinopoietic responses to schistosome worms and eggs.
Article in International journal for parasitology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Previous History of American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis Alters Susceptibility and Immune Response AgainstFrontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- The Role of MIF on Eosinophil Biology and Eosinophilic Inflammation.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2020Review
- Immune signatures of pathogenesis in the peritoneal compartment during early infection of sheep with Fasciola hepatica.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Purinergic signaling in schistosomal infection.Biomedical journal · 2016Review
- Article
- Purinergic P2Y12 Receptor Activation in Eosinophils and the Schistosomal Host Response.PloS one · 2015Article
- Neuronal activation and plasticity in Schistosoma mansoni infected mice.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2012Article
- Schistosoma mansoni venom allergen like proteins present differential allergic responses in a murine model of airway inflammation.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2012Article
- Induction of type 2 responses by schistosome worms during prepatent infection.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2010Article
- Advances in bioluminescence imaging of live animal models.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Using a sensitive transgenic reporter mouse system and in vivo biophotonic imaging techniques, we present a dynamic analysis of eosinophil responses to schistosome infection. Use of this methodology provided previously unattainable detail on the spatial and temporal distribution of tissue eosinophilia and eosinopoietic responses to schistosome worms and eggs. Dramatic hepatic and intestinal eosinophilia in response to the deposition of schistosome eggs, with accompanying eosinopoiesis in the bone marrow, was observed between weeks 8 and 10 p.i., with subsequent downregulation evident by week 11. Contrary to expectations, we also demonstrate that schistosome parasites themselves induce significant intestinal eosinophilia and eosinopoiesis in the bone marrow at very early stages during prepatent infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.