Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15944437›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2005

Evolutionary diversity and potential recombinogenic role of integration targets of Non-LTR retrotransposons.

Andrew J Gentles, Oleksiy Kohany, Jerzy Jurka

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome-wide analysis of short interspersed nuclear elements provides insight into gene and genome evolution in citrus.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew J GentlesGenetic Information Research Institute, Mountain View, California, USA.
Oleksiy Kohany
Jerzy Jurka
Genetic Information Research Institute · US

Funding

Rephase Update-a Database of Repetitive SequencesP41LM006252 · NLM · GENETIC INFORMATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI JURKA, JERZY WLADYSLAW · 1996 to 2013
$6.0M
NLM NIH HHS 2P41 LM006252-07A1NLM NIH HHS P41 LM006252NLM NIH HHS P41 LM006252-07A1NLM NIH HHS P41 LM006252-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short interspersed elements (SINEs) make up a significant fraction of total DNA in mammalian genomes, providing a rich substrate for chromosomal rearrangements by SINE-SINE recombinations. Proliferation of mammalian SINEs is mediated primarily by long interspersed element 1 (L1) non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons that preferentially integrate at DNA sequence targets with an average length of approximately 15 bp and containing conserved endonucleolytic nicking signals at both ends. We report that sequence variations in the first of the two nicking signals, represented by a 5'-TT-AAAA consensus sequence, affect the position of the second signal thus leading to target site duplications (TSDs) of different lengths. The length distribution of TSDs appears to be affected also by L1-encoded enzyme variants because targets with the same 5' nicking site can be of different average lengths in different mammalian species. Taking this into account, we reanalyzed the second nicking site and found that it is larger and includes more conserved sites than previously appreciated, with a consensus of 5'-ANTNTN-AA. We also studied potential involvement of the nicking sites in stimulating recombinations between SINEs. We determined that SINEs retaining TSDs with perfect 5'-TT-AAAA nicking sites appear to be lost relatively rapidly from the human and rat genomes and less rapidly from dog. We speculate that the introduction of DNA breaks induced by recurring endonucleolytic attacks at these sites, combined with the ubiquitousness of SINEs, may significantly promote recombination between repetitive elements, leading to the observed losses. At the same time, new L1 subfamilies may be selected for "incompatibility" with preexisting targets. This provides a possible driving force for the continual emergence of new L1 subfamilies which, in turn, may affect selection of L1-dependent SINE subfamilies.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic VariationRecombination, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceDogsFemaleGene FrequencyHumansMaleRatsRetroelementsShort Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsTerminal Repeat SequencesRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID15944437
PMCPMC1400617
OpenAlexW2110324729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.