ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2005
Evolutionary diversity and potential recombinogenic role of integration targets of Non-LTR retrotransposons.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transposable elements as evolutionary catalysts of ant macrodiversity.Science advances · 2026Article
- RNA transcription and degradation of Alu retrotransposons depends on sequence features and evolutionary history.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Genome-wide analysis of short interspersed nuclear elements provides insight into gene and genome evolution in citrus.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2020Article
- The dynamic proliferation of CanSINEs mirrors the complex evolution of Feliforms.BMC evolutionary biology · 2014Article
- Transposable elements are a significant contributor to tandem repeats in the human genome.Comparative and functional genomics · 2012Article
- All y'all need to know 'bout retroelements in cancer.Seminars in cancer biology · 2010Review
- Breaking the computational barrier: a divide-conquer and aggregate based approach for Alu insertion site characterisation.International journal of computational biology and drug design · 2009Article
- Article
- Inviting instability: Transposable elements, double-strand breaks, and the maintenance of genome integrity.Mutation research · 2007Review
- The human LINE-1 retrotransposon creates DNA double-strand breaks.Journal of molecular biology · 2006Article
- Carnivore-specific SINEs (Can-SINEs): distribution, evolution, and genomic impact.The Journal of heredityReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Short interspersed elements (SINEs) make up a significant fraction of total DNA in mammalian genomes, providing a rich substrate for chromosomal rearrangements by SINE-SINE recombinations. Proliferation of mammalian SINEs is mediated primarily by long interspersed element 1 (L1) non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons that preferentially integrate at DNA sequence targets with an average length of approximately 15 bp and containing conserved endonucleolytic nicking signals at both ends. We report that sequence variations in the first of the two nicking signals, represented by a 5'-TT-AAAA consensus sequence, affect the position of the second signal thus leading to target site duplications (TSDs) of different lengths. The length distribution of TSDs appears to be affected also by L1-encoded enzyme variants because targets with the same 5' nicking site can be of different average lengths in different mammalian species. Taking this into account, we reanalyzed the second nicking site and found that it is larger and includes more conserved sites than previously appreciated, with a consensus of 5'-ANTNTN-AA. We also studied potential involvement of the nicking sites in stimulating recombinations between SINEs. We determined that SINEs retaining TSDs with perfect 5'-TT-AAAA nicking sites appear to be lost relatively rapidly from the human and rat genomes and less rapidly from dog. We speculate that the introduction of DNA breaks induced by recurring endonucleolytic attacks at these sites, combined with the ubiquitousness of SINEs, may significantly promote recombination between repetitive elements, leading to the observed losses. At the same time, new L1 subfamilies may be selected for "incompatibility" with preexisting targets. This provides a possible driving force for the continual emergence of new L1 subfamilies which, in turn, may affect selection of L1-dependent SINE subfamilies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.