Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15942757›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2005

Molecular mapping of a fertility restorer gene for Owen cytoplasmic male sterility in sugar beet.

E Hagihara, N Itchoda, Y Habu, S Iida, T Mikami, T Kubo

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. OsPPR939, a nad5 splicing factor, is essential for plant growth and pollen development in rice.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Article
  2. Identification of molecular variants of the nonrestoring restorer-of-fertility 1 allele in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2016
    Article
  3. OMICS Technologies and Applications in Sugar Beet.Frontiers in plant science · 2016
    Review
  4. Genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium analysis in elite sugar beet breeding lines and wild beet accessions.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2014
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E HagiharaGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8589, Japan.
N Itchoda
Y Habu
S Iida
T Mikami
T Kubo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report here the molecular mapping of a fertility restorer gene (named Rf1) for Owen cytoplasmic male sterility in sugar beet. Eight AFLP and two RAPD markers, tightly linked to the Rf1 locus, were identified using bulked segregant analysis. Three AFLP markers, mAFEM972, mAFEM976 and mAFEM985, were found to co-segregate with the Rf1 allele in our mapping populations. With the help of RFLP markers, previously mapped on the sugar beet genome, we showed that Rf1 is positioned in the terminal region of linkage group Kiel III/Koeln IV. This map location agrees well with that found for the restorer gene X, which suggests that the Rf1 locus corresponds to the X locus. The availability of the molecular markers will facilitate the selection of maintainer-pollinator lines in breeding program and provide the foundation for map-based cloning of the Rf1 gene.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingBeta vulgarisBreedingFertilityGenes, PlantNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.