Trial reportThorax2005
Intravenous aminophylline in patients admitted to hospital with non-acidotic exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Thorax, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- A narrative review of theophylline: is there still a place for an old friend?Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Gold 2023: Highlights for primary care.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2023Article
- Increased Red Blood Cell Distribution Predicts Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Report: GOLD Executive Summary.The European respiratory journal · 2023Article
- Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Report: GOLD Executive Summary.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Article
- Methylxanthine Treatment in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in China: A Real-World Study Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Integrating 3-omics data analyze rat lung tissue of COPD states and medical intervention by delineation of molecular and pathway alterations.Bioscience reports · 2017Article
- Possible harms of theophylline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2014Article
- Theophylline.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2010Review
- [What is proven in the treatment of COPD?].Der Internist · 2009Article
- Management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly : an appraisal of published evidence.Drugs & aging · 2007Review
- ABC of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Acute exacerbations.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Review
- Management of acute ventilatory failure.Postgraduate medical journal · 2006Review
- COPD exacerbations.5: management.Thorax · 2006Review
- Strategies for improving outcomes of COPD exacerbations.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2006Review
- An overview of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Can tests of small airways' function guide diagnosis and management?Annals of thoracic medicineReview
- 2021 Guideline for the Management of COPD Exacerbations: Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey (EMAT) / Turkish Thoracic Society (TTS) Clinical Practice Guideline Task Force.Turkish journal of emergency medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntravenous aminophylline is commonly used in the treatment of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), despite limited evidence for its efficacy and known risks of toxicity. We hypothesised that adding intravenous aminophylline to conventional treatment would not produce clinically important changes in the speed of spirometric or symptomatic recovery or shorten hospital stay in patients with exacerbations of COPD.
methodsEighty patients admitted to hospital with non-acidotic exacerbations of COPD were recruited at admission to a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study comparing intravenous aminophylline 0.5 mg/kg/hour after an appropriate loading dose with an equivalent volume of 0.9% saline. The primary outcome was the change in post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) over the first 5 days of the admission. Secondary end points were changes in self-reported breathlessness, arterial blood gas tensions, forced vital capacity (FVC), and length of hospital stay.
resultsThere was no difference in the post-bronchodilator FEV(1) over the first 5 days between the aminophylline and placebo groups. In the aminophylline group, 2 hours of treatment produced a small but significant rise in arterial pH (p = 0.001) and a fall in arterial carbon dioxide tension (p = 0.01) compared with placebo treatment. There were no differences in the severity of breathlessness, post-bronchodilator FVC, or length of hospital stay between the groups. Nausea was a more frequent side effect in the aminophylline group (46% v 22%; p<0.05), but palpitations and headache were noted equally in both groups.
conclusionsAlthough intravenous aminophylline produced small improvements in acid-base balance, these did not influence the subsequent clinical course. No evidence was found for any clinically important additional effect of aminophylline treatment when used with high dose nebulised bronchodilators and oral corticosteroids. Given its known toxicity, we cannot therefore recommend the use of intravenous aminophylline in the treatment of non-acidotic COPD exacerbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.