Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15937645›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2005

Prognostic significance of the immunohistochemical index of survivin in glioma: a comparative study with the MIB-1 index.

Masaki Uematsu, Ikuroh Ohsawa, Toshiyuki Aokage, Kiyomi Nishimaki, Kouji Matsumoto, Hiroshi Takahashi, Sadamitsu Asoh, Akira Teramoto, Shigeo Ohta

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Induction of robust type-I CD8+ T-cell responses in WHO grade 2 low-grade glioma patients receiving peptide-based vaccines in combination with poly-ICLC.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Survivin Monoclonal Antibodies Detect Survivin Cell Surface Expression and Inhibit Tumor GrowthClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ependymomas: development of immunotherapeutic strategies.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masaki UematsuDepartment of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Institute of Development and Aging Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, 1-396 Kosugi-cho, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ikuroh Ohsawa
Toshiyuki Aokage
Kiyomi Nishimaki
Kouji Matsumoto
Hiroshi Takahashi
Sadamitsu Asoh
Akira Teramoto
Shigeo Ohta
Nippon Medical School · JPNippon Medical School Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurvivin has been identified as a protein expressed in cancer cells and a member of the inhibitor-of-apoptosis protein family. Recent studies suggest that the expression of survivin increases during the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, and may be used in clinical prognosis. We examined whether survivin expression in human gliomas would be a correlative of prognosis.

methodsWe prepared polyclonal anti-survivin serum to establish a survivin index for stained sections, using an immunohistochemical procedure, according to the method used for scoring MIB-1 index, and then stained 29 paraffin-embedded sections from surgical specimens of 29 patients who were classified into three grades of World Health Organization with the mean age of low grade astocytoma (grade II) being 34.7; anaplastic astrocytoma (grade III), 48.8; and glioblastoma multiform (grade IV), 58.4.

resultsOn staining with the anti-survivin antiserum, all specimens contained positive cells, but the survivin index was heterogeneous among grades. The mean percentage of immunoreactive cells in each specimen was 70.0 (SD 18.2) in grade II, 81.3 (16.5) in grade III, and 85.0 (13.6) in grade IV. Then we compared the survivin index to the MIB-1 index and found that in low-grade gliomas (grade II and III), the difference in survival times between the high and low survivin indexes was significant (P=0.007), whereas that between the high and low MIB-1 indexes was not significant (P=0.092). ONCLUSION: Survivin is more sensitive marker than MIB-1 for the evaluation of low-grade gliomas in that it helps to predict patient survival. Much larger glioma patient series are needed to validate the findings of our limited study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodiesBiomarkers, TumorBlotting, WesternBrain NeoplasmsChildDisease ProgressionDNA, ComplementaryFemaleGliomaHumansImmunohistochemistryInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsKi-67 AntigenAntibodiesBiomarkers, TumorBIRC5 protein, humanDNA, ComplementaryInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsKi-67 AntigenMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsSurvivin

Identifiers

PMID15937645
OpenAlexW2018114565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.