Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15937071›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2006

Comprehensive analysis of CDKN2A (p16INK4A/p14ARF) and CDKN2B genes in 53 melanoma index cases considered to be at heightened risk of melanoma.

K Laud, C Marian, M F Avril, M Barrois, A Chompret, A M Goldstein, M A Tucker, P A Clark, G Peters, V Chaudru and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Disruption of CTCF binding by germline non-coding variants inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Biomedicines · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Germline mutations predisposing to melanoma.Journal of cutaneous pathology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Germline hemizygous deletion ofNPJ genomic medicine · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

K LaudService de Génétique, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France.
C Marian
M F Avril
M Barrois
A Chompret
A M Goldstein
M A Tucker
P A Clark
G Peters
V Chaudru
F Demenais
A Spatz
M W Smith
G M Lenoir
B Bressac-de Paillerets
French Hereditary Melanoma Study Group
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRNational Cancer Institute · USThe Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn · GBDepartment of Health and Human Services · USInserm · FRUniversité d'Évry Val-d'Essonne · FR

Funding

Family Studies ZIACP004410 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SAVAGE, SHARON A. · 2009 to 2025
$56.1M
STUDIES OF PERSONS AT HIGH RISK OF CANCER--GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGYZ01CP004410 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI TUCKER, MARGARET · 1985 to 2008
$15.0M
HIGH-THROUGHPUT GENOTYPING FOR MALD AND CANDIDATE GENE ANALYSISZ01BC010270 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SMITH, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 1997 to 2008
$804k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComprehensive analysis of the 9p21 locus including the CDKN2A, ARF, and CDKN2B genes in 53 individuals from melanoma index cases considered to be at heightened risk of melanoma. METHODS AND

resultsUsing a combination of DNA sequencing, gene copy number by real time quantitative PCR, linkage analysis, and transcript analysis in haploid somatic cell hybrids, we found no evidence for germline alteration in either coding or non-coding domains of CDKN2A and CDKN2B. However, we identified a p14ARF exon 1beta missense germline mutation (G16D) in a melanoma-neural system tumour syndrome (CMM+NST) family and a 8474 bp germline deletion from 196 bp upstream of p14ARF exon 1beta initiation codon to 11233 bp upstream of exon 1alpha of p16(INK4A) in a family with five melanoma cases. For three out of 10 families with at least three melanoma cases, the disease gene was unlinked to the 9p21 region, while linkage analysis was not fully conclusive for seven families.

conclusionsThese data reinforce the hypothesis that ARF is a melanoma susceptibility gene and suggest that germline deletions specifically affecting p14ARF may not be solely responsible for NST susceptibility. Predisposition to CMM+NST could either be due to complete disruption of the CDKN2A locus or be the result of more complex genetic inheritance. In addition, the absence of any genetic alteration in 50 melanoma prone families or patients suggests the presence of additional tumour suppressor genes possibly in the 9p21 region, and on other chromosomes.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorChromosomes, Human, Pair 9Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15DNA Mutational AnalysisExonsGene DeletionGenes, NeoplasmGenetic LinkageGerm-Line MutationHumansMelanomaMutation, MissensePedigreeRisk FactorsRNA, MessengerRNA, UntranslatedCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15RNA, MessengerRNA, UntranslatedTumor Suppressor Protein p14ARF

Identifiers

PMID15937071
PMCPMC2564502
OpenAlexW2130477564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.