Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15935122›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2005

Behcet's Disease: Current Therapeutic Perspectives.

Merav Leiba, Michael Ehrenfeld

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Merav LeibaDepartment of Medicine C, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer Hospital & the Tel-Aviv University Faculty of Medicine,Tel Aviv52621,Israel. ehrenfel@post.tau.ac.il.
Michael Ehrenfeld
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behcet's disease is a chronic relapsing systemic vasculitis of small and large vessels, of unknown etiology, characterized by recurrent oral and genital ulcers, and ocular inflammation. Other involved organs may include the joints, skin, and gastrointestinal tract, as well as the pulmonary, renal, central nervous, and the cardiovascular systems. The treatment of Behcet's disease is basically empiric, geared to control the symptoms, suppress the inflammatory process, and prevent organ damage. Thus, various anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents have been used as the main therapeutic modalities, although none of them has been effective in controlling the diverse symptoms. Earlier, these drugs included colchicine, azathioprine, systemic corticosteroids, dapsone, cyclosporine A, and tacrolimus. Recently emerging studies show the effectiveness of thalidomide, interferon alpha, interferon gamma, acyclovir, low-dose weekly methotrexate, cyclophosphamide pulse therapy, and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. Anti-TNF agents, such as infliximab, are emerging as being effective in rapid control of sight-threatening panuveitis and cerebral vasculitis, as well as in orogenital ulcerations, gastrointestinal disease, and skin lesions of Behcet's disease. Limited anecdotal case reports have been published with the use of the fusion protein etanercept in Behcet's disease. Hopefully, prospective clinical trials, which are now ongoing, will provide more data as to the efficacy of the anti-TNF agents, compared with the conventional immunosuppressive therapy.

Identifiers

PMID15935122
OpenAlexW2046388950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.