ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005
Childhood cancer in relation to distance from high voltage power lines in England and Wales: a case-control study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Effect of High-voltage Electrical Field Exposure on Neurobiological Factors and Visual Working Memory of Macaques.Basic and clinical neuroscience · 2025Article
- A comprehensive mechanism of biological and health effects of anthropogenic extremely low frequency and wireless communication electromagnetic fields.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Examining the relationship between land use and childhood leukemia and lymphoma in Tehran.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Sensitivity of endogenous autofluorescence in HeLa cells to the application of external magnetic fields.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Human‑made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced‑oscillation and voltage‑gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (Review).International journal of oncology · 2021Review
- The Critical Importance of Molecular Biomarkers and Imaging in the Study of Electrohypersensitivity. A Scientific Consensus International Report.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- High prevalence of gastroschisis in Brazilian triple side border: A socioenvironmental spatial analysis.PloS one · 2021Article
- Electromagnetic Field Exposure in Kindergarten Children: Responsive Health Risk Concern.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Challenges in coupling atmospheric electricity with biological systems.International journal of biometeorology · 2021Article
- Electric field and air ion exposures near high voltage overhead power lines and adult cancers: a case control study across England and Wales.International journal of epidemiology · 2020Article
- Establishment and Maintenance of Power Lines are Important for Insect Diversity in Central Europe.Zoological studies · 2020Article
- Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields of High Voltage Overhead Power Lines and Female Infertility.The international journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2019Article
- Cryptochrome: The magnetosensor with a sinister side?PLoS biology · 2018Article
- Childhood cancer research in Oxford II: The Childhood Cancer Research Group.British journal of cancer · 2018Article
- Proximity to overhead power lines and childhood leukaemia: an international pooled analysis.British journal of cancer · 2018Article
- Residential magnetic fields exposure and childhood leukemia: a population-based case-control study in California.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2017Article
- Exposure Modelling of Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields from Overhead Power Lines and Its Validation by Measurements.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017Article
- Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2017Article
- Healthy Cities of Tomorrow: the Case for Large Scale Built Environment-Health Studies.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2017Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether there is an association between distance of home address at birth from high voltage power lines and the incidence of leukaemia and other cancers in children in England and Wales.
designCase-control study.
settingCancer registry and National Grid records. SUBJECTS: Records of 29 081 children with cancer, including 9700 with leukaemia. Children were aged 0-14 years and born in England and Wales, 1962-95. Controls were individually matched for sex, approximate date of birth, and birth registration district. No active participation was required.
main outcome measuresDistance from home address at birth to the nearest high voltage overhead power line in existence at the time.
resultsCompared with those who lived > 600 m from a line at birth, children who lived within 200 m had a relative risk of leukaemia of 1.69 (95% confidence interval 1.13 to 2.53); those born between 200 and 600 m had a relative risk of 1.23 (1.02 to 1.49). There was a significant (P < 0.01) trend in risk in relation to the reciprocal of distance from the line. No excess risk in relation to proximity to lines was found for other childhood cancers.
conclusionsThere is an association between childhood leukaemia and proximity of home address at birth to high voltage power lines, and the apparent risk extends to a greater distance than would have been expected from previous studies. About 4% of children in England and Wales live within 600 m of high voltage lines at birth. If the association is causal, about 1% of childhood leukaemia in England and Wales would be attributable to these lines, though this estimate has considerable statistical uncertainty. There is no accepted biological mechanism to explain the epidemiological results; indeed, the relation may be due to chance or confounding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.