Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15931375›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2005

Factors affecting statistical power in the detection of genetic association.

Derek Gordon, Stephen J Finch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Identification of genetic variants affecting reproduction traits in Vrindavani cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A POWERFUL METHOD FOR INCLUDING GENOTYPE UNCERTAINTY IN TESTS OF HARDY-WEINBERG EQUILIBRIUM.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Derek GordonLaboratory of Statistical Genetics, Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021, USA. gordon@linkage.rockefeller.edu
Stephen J Finch

Funding

LINKAGE ANALYSIS METHODS IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH044292 · NIMH · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI OTT, JURG · 1989 to 2008
$1.3M
LINKAGE ANALYSIS METHODS IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR37MH044292 · NIMH · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI OTT, JURG · 1993 to 2002
$788k
TOPICS IN GENETIC ANALYSIS--ERRORS AND TWO-LOCUS MODELSK01HG000055 · NHGRI · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI GORDON, DEREK · 2000 to 2004
$457k
NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG000055NHGRI NIH HHS K01-HG00055NIMH NIH HHS MH44292NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH044292NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH044292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mapping of disease genes to specific loci has received a great deal of attention in the last decade, and many advances in therapeutics have resulted. Here we review family-based and population-based methods for association analysis. We define the factors that determine statistical power and show how study design and analysis should be designed to maximize the probability of localizing disease genes.

Indexed as

Linkage DisequilibriumLod ScoreModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait, HeritableData Interpretation, StatisticalGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID15931375
PMCPMC1137002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.