ArticleClinical medicine & research2004
Rapid molecular diagnosis of lactobacillus bacteremia by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the 16S rRNA gene.
Article in Clinical medicine & research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Methodological Aspects of Multiplex Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism-Technique to Describe the Genetic Diversity of Soil Bacteria, Archaea and Fungi.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Development of a Lactobacillus specific T-RFLP method to determine lactobacilli diversity in complex samples.Journal of microbiological methods · 2012Article
- Characterisation of bacteria in ascites--reporting the potential of culture-independent, molecular analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2010Article
- Diagnostic difficulties of Lactobacillus casei bacteraemia in immunocompetent patients: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBacteremia due to lactobacilli is uncommon, yet it is increasing in frequency, especially among immunosuppressed patients. In the clinical laboratory, lactobacilli must be subcultured from positive blood cultures before identification by traditional biochemical methods. Delays in diagnosis are significant because the organisms are inherently resistant to vancomycin, a drug frequently prescribed for empiric therapy for gram-positive bacteremia. Recently, we developed a rapid terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) diagnostic assay based on species-specific variations in the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. We sought to apply this technique to the identification of Lactobacillus spp. from three cases of bacteremia.
designThe results of the T-RFLP analysis are compared with two standard biochemical identification methods.
methodsLactobacillus strains were isolated from positive clinical blood cultures. Initial suspect cultures were subcultured and characterized using an automated substrate hydrolysis system and Lactobacillus carbohydrate fermentation profiles. Further biochemical and molecular analyses were performed from isolates propagated in Lactobacillus MRS broth. DNA was extracted and the 16S rRNA gene sequenced. Two sets of fluorescent labeled primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene were used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with chromosomal preparations from reference strains and blood isolates. The PCR products were digested with restriction enzymes and terminal-restriction fragment profile analysis performed.
resultsT-RFLP analysis correctly identified the Lactobacillus species in each case. T-RFLP analysis could be completed within 8 hours of obtaining a positive blood culture as compared to more than the 24 to 48 hours required for traditional culturing and biochemical characterizations.
conclusionT-RFLP analysis allows for rapid identification of Lactobacillus directly from positive blood cultures and circumvents the requirement for subculture. Reduced diagnostic time has implications for duration of infection, the cost of patient care, length of hospitalization, development of broad-spectrum antibiotic resistance, and mortality due to bacteremia. T-RFLP profiling represents a highly reproducible and predictive source for identification of many organisms associated with bacteremia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.