Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15928711›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2005

Preventing re-replication of chromosomal DNA.

J Julian Blow, Anindya Dutta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 343 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
343citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

343 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Chromatin architecture sets origin licensing capacity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Stage-specific MCM protein expression inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cellular Responses to Widespread DNA Replication Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

283 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J Julian BlowWellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK. j.j.blow@dundee.ac.uk
Anindya Dutta

Funding

The role of MCM8-9 in genomic instability of cancersR01CA060499 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Anindya Dutta · 1994 to 2026
$8.6M
ROLE OF CY MOTIFS IN SUBSTRATE RECOGNITION BY CDKSR01CA089406 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI DUTTA, ANINDYA · 2001 to 2011
$2.1M
Cancer Research UK A3135NCI NIH HHS R01 CA060499NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To ensure its duplication, chromosomal DNA must be precisely duplicated in each cell cycle, with no sections left unreplicated, and no sections replicated more than once. Eukaryotic cells achieve this by dividing replication into two non-overlapping phases. During late mitosis and G1, replication origins are 'licensed' for replication by loading the minichromosome maintenance (Mcm) 2-7 proteins to form a pre-replicative complex. Mcm2-7 proteins are then essential for initiating and elongating replication forks during S phase. Recent data have provided biochemical and structural insight into the process of replication licensing and the mechanisms that regulate it during the cell cycle.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationAnimalsCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomesCyclin EHumansMacromolecular SubstancesModels, MolecularProtein Structure, QuaternaryReplication OriginCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin EMacromolecular Substances

Identifiers

PMID15928711
PMCPMC2688777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.