Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15928405›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2005

The limit of photoreceptor sensitivity: molecular mechanisms of dark noise in retinal cones.

David Holcman, Juan I Korenbrot

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dark continuous noise from visual pigment as a major mechanism underlying rod-cone difference in light sensitivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Detection of single photons by toad and mouse rods.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Binding by asynchrony: the neuronal phase code.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David HolcmanKeck Center for Theoretical Neurobiology and Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, 94143, USA.
Juan I Korenbrot

Funding

MECHANISMS OF TRANSDUCTION IN RETINAL CONE PHOTORECEPTORR01EY005498 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KORENBROT, JUAN IGAL · 1985 to 2007
$2.6M
NEI NIH HHS EY-05498NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005498NEI NIH HHS R56 EY005498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection threshold in cone photoreceptors requires the simultaneous absorption of several photons because single photon photocurrent is small in amplitude and does not exceed intrinsic fluctuations in the outer segment dark current (dark noise). To understand the mechanisms that limit light sensitivity, we characterized the molecular origin of dark noise in intact, isolated bass single cones. Dark noise is caused by continuous fluctuations in the cytoplasmic concentrations of both cGMP and Ca(2+) that arise from the activity in darkness of both guanylate cyclase (GC), the enzyme that synthesizes cGMP, and phosphodiesterase (PDE), the enzyme that hydrolyzes it. In cones loaded with high concentration Ca(2+) buffering agents, we demonstrate that variation in cGMP levels arise from fluctuations in the mean PDE enzymatic activity. The rates of PDE activation and inactivation determine the quantitative characteristics of the dark noise power density spectrum. We developed a mathematical model based on the dynamics of PDE activity that accurately predicts this power spectrum. Analysis of the experimental data with the theoretical model allows us to determine the rates of PDE activation and deactivation in the intact photoreceptor. In fish cones, the mean lifetime of active PDE at room temperature is approximately 55 ms. In nonmammalian rods, in contrast, active PDE lifetime is approximately 555 ms. This remarkable difference helps explain why cones are noisier than rods and why cone photocurrents are smaller in peak amplitude and faster in time course than those in rods. Both these features make cones less light sensitive than rods.

Indexed as

Adaptation, OcularAlgorithmsAnimalsBassCalciumDarknessData Interpretation, StatisticalElectrophysiologyGuanylate CyclaseHydroxylamineIn Vitro TechniquesKineticsMembrane PotentialsModels, BiologicalPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesCalciumGuanylate CyclaseHydroxylaminePhosphoric Diester Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID15928405
PMCPMC2234084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.