ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2005
Exposure to the electrofusion process can increase the immunogenicity of human cells.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Immunologic monitoring of cellular responses by dendritic/tumor cell fusion vaccines.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2011Review
- Regulation of tumor immunity by tumor/dendritic cell fusions.Clinical & developmental immunology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cellular products obtained following electrofusion (EF) of dendritic cells (DC) and tumour cells have shown promise as cancer vaccines. The immunogenicity of these preparations has been attributed to the presence of small numbers of DC-tumour hybrids and the contribution of the non-hybrid tumour cells present has received little attention. In this report, we investigated the effect of the EF process on the immunogenicity of allogeneic human cells, in particular the colorectal cell line, SW620. EF conditions were optimised to yield the maximum number of DC-SW620 hybrids co-expressing tumour associated antigen (TAA) and DC associated antigens. Exposure of SW620 to EF induced significant increases (P < 0.05) in apoptosis and necrosis. Pre-exposure of SW620 to the EF buffer alone [0.3 M glucose, 0.1 mM Ca(CH3COO)2 and 0.5 mM Mg(CH3COO)(2)] resulted in significant increases in TAA uptake by DC during co-culture (P < 0.05). DC phenotype was, however, not altered by exposure to EF treated tumour cells. In co-cultures of PBMC responders with SW620, the levels of IFNgamma release and cytotoxic activity were significantly increased (P < 0.05) by pre-exposure of the SW620 to EF. Pre-exposure of allogeneic non-T cells, the colorectal cell line Lovo and a breast cancer cell line (MCF7) to EF also significantly (P < 0.05) increased the levels of IFNgamma release by responding PBMC. These results demonstrate that the EF process itself can increase the immunogenicity of at least some human cell types independently of hybrid formation. These findings suggest that EF protocols should be evaluated with regard to the possibility that DC-tumour hybrids may not contribute all, or even most, of the immunostimulatory capacity present in preparations of EF treated cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.