ArticleDrug safety2005
Drug-induced anaphylaxis : case/non-case study based on an italian pharmacovigilance database.
Article in Drug safety, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disparities in rate, triggers, and management in pediatric and adult cases of suspected drug-induced anaphylaxis in Canada.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2018Trial
- Exploration of adverse event profiles for cefotaxime: a disproportionality analysis using the FDA adverse event reporting system.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Comparative Effects of Metamizole (Dipyrone) and Naproxen on Renal Function and Prostacyclin Synthesis in Salt-Depleted Healthy Subjects - A Randomized Controlled Parallel Group Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis in a Vietnamese Pharmacovigilance Database: Trends and Specific Signals from a Disproportionality Analysis.Drug safety · 2019Article
- Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis Documented in Electronic Health Records.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2019Article
- Detecting drug-herbal interaction using a spontaneous reporting system database: an example with benzylpenicillin and qingkailing injection.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Article
- Drug-induced anaphylactic reactions in Indian population: A systematic review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2014Article
- Adverse reactions to contrast media: an analysis of spontaneous reports in the database of the pharmacovigilance programme of India.Drug safety · 2014Article
- Mast cell degranulation induced by chlorogenic acid.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2010Article
- Suppression of gastric acid increases the risk of developing immunoglobulin E-mediated drug hypersensitivity: human diclofenac sensitization and a murine sensitization model.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2010Article
- Anaphylactoid reaction considered ciprofloxacin related: a case report and literature review.Clinical therapeutics · 2010Review
- Peanuts can contribute to anaphylactic shock by activating complement.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2009Article
- Cost-effectiveness of universal prophylaxis in pregnancy with prior group B streptococci colonization.Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2009Article
- Safety aspects of iodinated contrast media related to their physicochemical properties: a pharmacoepidemiology study in two Tuscany hospitals.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2008Article
- Influence of regulatory measures on the rate of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting in Italy.Drug safety · 2008Article
- Use and safety profile of antiepileptic drugs in Italy.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2007Article
- Hepatic adverse drug reactions: a case/non-case study in Italy.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2007Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the number of cases of anaphylaxis reported in association with different classes of drugs and compare it with other reports contained in the same database.
methodsThe data were obtained from a database containing all of the spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) coming from the Italian regions of Emilia Romagna, Lombardy and the Veneto, which are the main contributors to the Italian spontaneous surveillance system. The ADRs reported between January 1990 and December 2003 with a causality assessment of certainly, probably or possibly drug related (according to the WHO criteria) were analysed using a case/non-case design. The cases were defined as the reactions already coded by the WHO preferred terms of 'anaphylactic shock' or 'anaphylactoid reaction' (this last term also included anaphylactic reaction) and those with a time of event onset that suggested an allergic reaction and involved at least two of the skin, respiratory, gastrointestinal, CNS or cardiovascular systems; the non-cases were all of the other ADR reports. The frequency of the association between anaphylaxis and the suspected drug in comparison with the frequency of anaphylaxis associated to all of the other drugs was calculated using the ADR reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a measure of disproportionality.
resultsOur database contained 744 cases (including 307 cases of anaphylactic shock with 10 deaths) and 27 512 non-cases. The percentage of anaphylaxis cases reported in inpatients was higher than that among outpatients (59.1% vs 40.9%). This distribution is significantly different from that of the other ADR reports that mainly refer to outpatients. After intravenous drug administrations, anaphylactic shock cases were more frequent than anaphylactoid reactions or other ADRs, but more than one-third of these reactions were caused by an oral drug. Blood substitutes and radiology contrast agents had the highest RORs. Among the systemic antibacterial agents, anaphylaxis was disproportionally reported more often for penicillins, quinolones, cephalosporins and glycopeptides, but diclofenac was the only NSAID with a significant ROR. As a category, vaccines had a significantly lower ROR, thus indicating that anaphylaxis is reported proportionally less than other ADRs.
conclusionsAnaphylaxis is a severe ADR that may also occur with commonly used drugs. It represents 2.7% of all of the ADRs reported in an Italian spontaneous reporting database.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.