ArticleJournal of digital imaging2005
Conceptual approach for the design of radiology reporting interfaces: the talking template.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Speech recognition for clinical documentation from 1990 to 2018: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Pooled it
- Use and Perceptions of Oncology CT Structured Reports in Australia and New Zealand.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of guided reporting: quality and reading time of automatically generated radiology report in breast magnetic resonance imaging using a dedicated software solution.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Article
- Structured reporting in radiology enables epidemiological analysis through data mining: urolithiasis as a use case.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Efficient structured reporting in radiology using an intelligent dialogue system based on speech recognition and natural language processing.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Imaging Informatics: 25 Years of Progress.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2016Article
- Conversion of Radiology Reporting Templates to the MRRT Standard.Journal of digital imaging · 2015Article
- An electronic tool for systematic reporting of fractures on skeletal surveys in suspected child abuse: prototype development and physician feedback.Pediatric radiology · 2014Article
- Improving the utility of speech recognition through error detection.Journal of digital imaging · 2008Article
- Improvement of report workflow and productivity using speech recognition--a follow-up study.Journal of digital imaging · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Within the coming decade, traditional dictation supported by human transcription for radiology reports will be replaced by one or more computerized methods. This paper discusses the cognitive and process efficiency problems arising from currently available technology including speech recognition and menu-driven interfaces. A specific concept for interaction with the reporting interface is proposed. This is called the "talking template" and departs from other designs by providing for all interactions to be mediated through audible prompts and microphone controls. The radiologist can recapture efficiency and cognitive focus by dictating while viewing images without the "look away" problem inherent in other interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.