ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2005
Molecular regions underlying the activation of low- and high-voltage activating calcium channels.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contribution of S4 segments and S4-S5 linkers to the low-voltage activation properties of T-type CaV3.3 channels.PloS one · 2018Article
- Role of individual S4 segments in gating of CaChannels (Austin, Tex.) · 2018Article
- Selectivity filters and cysteine-rich extracellular loops in voltage-gated sodium, calcium, and NALCN channels.Frontiers in physiology · 2015Review
- A single amino acid change in Ca(v)1.2 channels eliminates the permeation and gating differences between Ca(2+) and Ba(2+).The Journal of membrane biology · 2010Article
- Alternative splicing within the I-II loop controls surface expression of T-type Ca(v)3.1 calcium channels.FEBS letters · 2008Article
- The effect of the outermost basic residues in the S4 segments of the Ca(V)3.1 T-type calcium channel on channel gating.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have studied two aspects of calcium channel activation. First, we investigated the molecular regions that are important in determining differences in activation between low- and high-voltage activated channels. For this, we made chimeras between the low-voltage activating Ca(V)3.1 channel and the high-voltage activating Ca(V)1.2 channel. Chimeras were expressed in oocytes, and calcium channel currents recorded by voltage clamp. For domain I, we found that the molecular region that is important in determining the voltage dependence of activation comprises the pore regions S5-P as well as P-S6, but surprisingly not the voltage sensor S1-S4 region, which might have been expected to play a major part. By contrast, the smaller, but still significant, modulating effects of domain II on activation properties were due to effects involving both S1-S4 and S5-S6 but not the I/II linker. Second, during channel activation we studied movement of the S4 segment in domain I of one of the chimeras, using cysteine-scanning mutagenesis. The reagent parachloromercuribenzensulfonate inhibited currents for mutants V263, A265, L266 and A268, but not for F269 and V271, and voltage dependence of inhibition for residue V263 indicated S4 movement, which occurred before channel opening. The data indicate movement outwards upon depolarisation so as to expose amino acids up to residue 268 in S4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15924245What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.