Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15923293›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2005

Monitoring STI prevalence using telephone surveys and mailed urine specimens: a pilot test.

E Eggleston, C F Turner, S M Rogers, A Roman, W C Miller, M A Villarroel, L Ganapathi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E EgglestonHealth and Behavior Measurement Program, Research Triangle Institute, 1615 M Street NW, Suite 740, Washington DC, 20036, USA. eeggleston@rti.org
C F Turner
S M Rogers
A Roman
W C Miller
M A Villarroel
L Ganapathi
RTI International · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis pilot test assessed the feasibility of a cost effective population based approach to STI monitoring using automated telephone interviews, urine specimen collection kits sent out and returned by US Postal Service mail, and monetary incentives to motivate participation.

methods100 residents of Baltimore, MD, USA, completed an automated telephone survey and agreed to mail in a urine specimen to be tested for chlamydia and gonorrhoea. Participants were paid dollar 10 for completing the survey and dollar 40 for mailing the specimen.

results86% of survey participants mailed in a urine specimen for testing.

conclusionsAutomated telephone surveys linked with testing of mailed-in urine specimens may be a feasible lower cost (relative to household surveys) method of estimating infection prevalences in a population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBaltimoreChlamydia InfectionsFeasibility StudiesFemaleGonorrheaHealth SurveysHumansMaleMotivationPilot ProjectsPrevalenceReminder SystemsSpecimen HandlingTelephone

Identifiers

PMID15923293
PMCPMC1744988
OpenAlexW2128088777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.