Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15923272›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2006

Genetic, functional, and histopathological evaluation of two C-terminal BRCA1 missense variants.

P K Lovelock, S Healey, W Au, E Y M Sum, A Tesoriero, E M Wong, S Hinson, R Brinkworth, A Bekessy, O Diez and 17 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic background shapes AI-predicted variant effects.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phenotype-genotype correlation in familial breast cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2011
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

P K Lovelock
S Healey
W Au
E Y M Sum
A Tesoriero
E M Wong
S Hinson
R Brinkworth
A Bekessy
O Diez
L Izatt
E Solomon
M Jenkins
H Renard
J Hopper
P Waring
S V Tavtigian
D Goldgar
G J Lindeman
J E Visvader
F J Couch
B R Henderson
M Southey
G Chenevix-Trench
A B Spurdle
M A Brown
kConFab Investigators
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AUMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Queensland · AUGuy's Hospital · GBHospital de Sant Pau · ESKing's College Hospital · GBMillennium Institute · BRPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUWestmead Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe vast majority of BRCA1 missense sequence variants remain uncharacterized for their possible effect on protein expression and function, and therefore are unclassified in terms of their pathogenicity. BRCA1 plays diverse cellular roles and it is unlikely that any single functional assay will accurately reflect the total cellular implications of missense mutations in this gene.

objectiveTo elucidate the effect of two BRCA1 variants, 5236G>C (G1706A) and 5242C>A (A1708E) on BRCA1 function, and to survey the relative usefulness of several assays to direct the characterisation of other unclassified variants in BRCA genes. METHODS AND

resultsData from a range of bioinformatic, genetic, and histopathological analyses, and in vitro functional assays indicated that the 1708E variant was associated with the disruption of different cellular functions of BRCA1. In transient transfection experiments in T47D and 293T cells, the 1708E product was mislocalised to the cytoplasm and induced centrosome amplification in 293T cells. The 1708E variant also failed to transactivate transcription of reporter constructs in mammalian transcriptional transactivation assays. In contrast, the 1706A variant displayed a phenotype comparable to wildtype BRCA1 in these assays. Consistent with functional data, tumours from 1708E carriers showed typical BRCA1 pathology, while tumour material from 1706A carriers displayed few histopathological features associated with BRCA1 related tumours.

conclusionsA comprehensive range of genetic, bioinformatic, and functional analyses have been combined for the characterisation of BRCA1 unclassified sequence variants. Consistent with the functional analyses, the combined odds of causality calculated for the 1706A variant after multifactorial likelihood analysis (1:142) indicates a definitive classification of this variant as "benign". In contrast, functional assays of the 1708E variant indicate that it is pathogenic, possibly through subcellular mislocalisation. However, the combined odds of 262:1 in favour of causality of this variant does not meet the minimal ratio of 1000:1 for classification as pathogenic, and A1708E remains formally designated as unclassified. Our findings highlight the importance of comprehensive genetic information, together with detailed functional analysis for the definitive categorisation of unclassified sequence variants. This combination of analyses may have direct application to the characterisation of other unclassified variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAustraliaBRCA1 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCentrosomeFemaleGenes, ReporterHumansLoss of HeterozygosityMiddle AgedModels, MolecularMutation, MissenseProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProtein TransportRNA SplicingBRCA1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID15923272
PMCPMC2564506
OpenAlexW2107580132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.