Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15917542›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2005

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of imipenem during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients.

Douglas N Fish, Isaac Teitelbaum, Edward Abraham

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Impact of borderline minimum inhibitory concentration on the outcome of invasive infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae treated with β-lactams: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Doripenem Treatment during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Next-generation rifamycins for the treatment of mycobacterial infections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimisation of imipenem in critically ill patients.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Optimal Empiric Treatment forInfection and drug resistance · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Antimicrobial dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2015
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Douglas N FishUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Campus Box C-238, 4200 East Ninth Avenue, Denver, CO 80262, USA. doug.fish@uchsc.edu
Isaac Teitelbaum
Edward Abraham

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of imipenem were studied in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH; n=6 patients) or hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF; n=6 patients). Patients (mean+/-standard deviation age, 50.9+/-15.9 years; weight, 98.5+/-15.9 kg) received imipenem at 0.5 g every 8 to 12 h (total daily doses of 1 to 1.5 g/day) by intravenous infusion over 30 min. Pre- and postmembrane blood (plasma) and corresponding ultrafiltrate or dialysate samples were collected 1, 2, 4, and 8 or 12 h (depending on dosing interval) after completion of the drug infusion. Drug concentrations were measured using validated high-performance liquid chromatography methods. Mean systemic clearance (CL(S)) and elimination half-life (t1/2) of imipenem were 145+/-18 ml/min and 2.7+/-1.3 h during CVVH versus 178+/-18 ml/min and 2.6+/-1.6 h during CVVHDF, respectively. Imipenem clearance was substantially increased during both CVVH and CVVHDF, with membrane clearance representing 25% and 32% of CL(S), respectively. The results of this study indicate that CVVH and CVVHDF contribute to imipenem clearance to a greater degree than previously reported. Imipenem doses of 1.0 g/day appear to achieve concentrations adequate to treat most common gram-negative pathogens (MIC up to 2 microg/ml) during CVVH or CVVHDF, but doses of 2.0 g/day or more may be required to adequately treat and prevent resistance in pathogens with higher MICs (MIC=4 to 8 microg/ml). Higher doses should only be used after consideration of potential central nervous system toxicities or other risks of therapy in these severely ill patients.

Indexed as

Renal Replacement TherapyAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCilastatinCritical IllnessDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHemodiafiltrationHemofiltrationHumansImipenemKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCilastatinImipenemProtease Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID15917542
PMCPMC1140495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.