Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15915342›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2005

Reproducibility of a new caries risk test under different oral conditions.

U Schiffner, A Torres-Quintero

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

U SchiffnerSection of Preventive Dentistry, Department of Restorative and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dental and Oral Medicine, University of Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. schiffner@uke.uni-hamburg.de
A Torres-Quintero
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the caries risk test Clinpro Cario L-Pop (3 M Espe, D-Seefeld), which measures the lactic acid produced by different bacteria of the oral flora, under stable oral conditions. In a group of healthy volunteers (n=31), the test was carried out ten times during 2 weeks. During the test period, the subjects were requested not to change their oral hygiene habits to ensure stable oral conditions. To register possible alterations of oral conditions by medication, a questionnaire was used. In subjects who did not alter their oral conditions (n=20), the reproducibility was 82.0%, with especially low score variations in subjects with low lactate signal scores. Some subjects exhibited, mainly due to colds and their medication, alterations in their oral conditions. The reproducibility in this group was 60.0%. Both reproducibility values differ significantly. In conclusion, the new diagnostic device shows high reproducibility under stable oral conditions. The lower reproducibility under altered oral conditions gives evidence that the test might reflect changes in the oral microflora following preventive interventions and thus could be used to monitor the effect of such interventions.

Indexed as

Dental Caries Activity TestsAdultFemaleHumansLactic AcidMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentStatistics, NonparametricSurveys and QuestionnairesLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID15915342
OpenAlexW2166534204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.