ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2005
A prospective cohort study of surgical treatment for back pain with degenerated discs; study protocol.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Constellation of Chronic Low Back Pain and Other Subjective Symptoms: Does the View Differ From China?Spine · 2016Article
- One-year outcomes of surgical versus nonsurgical treatments for discogenic back pain: a community-based prospective cohort study.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2013Observational
- Do outcomes of acupuncture for back pain differ according to varying sociocultural contexts? The view from China.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2013Article
- Assessment of biopsychosocial risk factors for medical treatment: a collaborative approach.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2009Article
- Differences across health care systems in outcome and cost-utility of surgical and conservative treatment of chronic low back pain: a study protocol.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2008Article
- Article
- Differential item functioning impact in a modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe diagnosis of discogenic back pain often leads to spinal fusion surgery and may partly explain the recent rapid increase in lumbar fusion operations in the United States. Little is known about how patients undergoing lumbar fusion compare in preoperative physical and psychological function to patients who have degenerative discs, but receive only non-surgical care.
methodsOur group is implementing a multi-center prospective cohort study to compare patients with presumed discogenic pain who undergo lumbar fusion with those who have non-surgical care. We identify patients with predominant low back pain lasting at least six months, one or two-level disc degeneration confirmed by imaging, and a normal neurological exam. Patients are classified as surgical or non-surgical based on the treatment they receive during the six months following study enrollment.
resultsThree hundred patients discogenic low back pain will be followed in a prospective cohort study for two years. The primary outcome measure is the Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire at 24-months. We also evaluate several other dimensions of outcome, including pain, functional status, psychological distress, general well-being, and role disability.
conclusionThe primary aim of this prospective cohort study is to better define the outcomes of lumbar fusion for discogenic back pain as it is practiced in the United States. We additionally aim to identify characteristics that result in better patient selection for surgery. Potential predictors include demographics, work and disability compensation status, initial symptom severity and duration, imaging results, functional status, and psychological distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.