Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15912139›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2005

Opioid antagonists differ according to negative intrinsic efficacy in a mouse model of acute dependence.

Ellen A Walker, Steven N Sterious

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Methocinnamox Reverses and Prevents Fentanyl-Induced Ventilatory Depression in Rats.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Reversal and Prevention of the Respiratory-Depressant Effects of Heroin by the NovelThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  5. Constitutive Desensitization of Opioid Receptors in Peripheral Sensory Neurons.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen A WalkerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University School of Pharmacy, 3307 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA. ellen.walker@temple.edu
Steven N Sterious
Temple University · US

Funding

NEUTRAL ANTAGONISTS--FUNCTIONAL STUDIESR29DA010776 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WALKER, ELLEN ANN · 1997 to 2001
$198k
NIDA NIH HHS DA10776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to compare the capacity of opioid antagonists to elicit withdrawal jumping in mice following two acute pretreatment doses of the opioid agonist morphine. Antagonists that precipitate vigorous withdrawal jumping across both morphine treatment doses are hypothesized to be strong inverse agonists at the mu-opioid receptor, whereas antagonists that elicit withdrawal jumping in mice treated with the high but not the low dose of morphine are hypothesized to be weak inverse agonists. Male, Swiss-Webster mice (15-30 g) were acutely treated with 56 or 180 mg kg(-1) morphine 4 h prior to injection with naloxone, naltrexone, diprenorphine, nalorphine, or naloxonazine. Vertical jumping, paw tremors, and weight loss were recorded. Naloxone, naltrexone, and diprenorphine produced withdrawal jumping after 56 and 180 mg kg(-1)morphine pretreatment. Nalorphine and naloxonazine produced moderate withdrawal jumping after 180 mg kg(-1) morphine pretreatment, but failed to elicit significant withdrawal jumping after 56 mg kg(-1) morphine pretreatment. Nalorphine and naloxonazine blocked the withdrawal jumping produced by naloxone. All antagonists produced paw tremors and weight loss although these effects were generally not dose-dependent. Taken together, these findings reveal a rank order of negative intrinsic efficacy for these opioid antagonists as follows: naloxone=naltrexone> or =diprenorphine>nalorphine=naloxonazine. Furthermore, the observation that nalorphine and naloxonazine blocked the naloxone-induced withdrawal jumping provides additional evidence that nalorphine and naloxonazine are weaker inverse agonists than naloxone.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBody WeightBrainDiprenorphineDose-Response Relationship, DrugMaleMiceMorphineMorphine DependenceNaloxoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTremorDiprenorphineMorphineNaloxoneNaltrexoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID15912139
PMCPMC1576205
OpenAlexW2081734003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.