ReviewJournal of epidemiology and community health2005
A philosophical analysis of the Hill criteria.
Review in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Plasma levels of polychlorinated biphenyls, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and causation.Journal of environmental and public health · 2012Pooled it
- Long-term risk of depression after sevoflurane versus propofol anesthesia: a global propensity score-matched cohort study.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Neonatal sepsis as a cause of retinopathy of prematurity: An etiological explanation.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024Review
- Causal Pluralism in Medicine and its Implications for Clinical Practice.Journal for general philosophy of science = Zeitschrift fur allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie · 2024Article
- Causal inference concepts applied to three observational studies in the context of vaccine development: from theory to practice.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Phase 3 DREAM-HF Trial of Mesenchymal Precursor Cells in Chronic Heart Failure.Circulation research · 2019Review
- Causality, mosaics, and the health sciences.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2016Review
- A critical review of food-associated factors proposed in the etiology of feline hyperthyroidism.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2015Review
- Hume, Mill, Hill, and the sui generis epidemiologic approach to causal inference.American journal of epidemiology · 2013Article
- A review of causal inference for biomedical informatics.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2011Review
- Seven mistakes and potential solutions in epidemiology, including a call for a World Council of Epidemiology and Causality.Emerging themes in epidemiology · 2009Article
- The role of causal criteria in causal inferences: Bradford Hill's "aspects of association".Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I · 2009Article
- (-)-Epicatechin mediates beneficial effects of flavanol-rich cocoa on vascular function in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006Article
- Environmental and individual factors associated with protection and predisposition to autoimmune diseases.International journal of health sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The epidemiological literature contains an ongoing and diversified discussion of the Hill criteria. This article offers a philosophical analysis of the criteria, showing that the criteria are related to two different views of causality. The authors argue that the criteria of strength, specificity, consistency, experiment, and biological gradient are related to a probabilistic regularity view of causality, whereas the criteria of coherence, plausibility, and analogy are related to a generative view of causality. The criterion of temporality is not related to either view, but may in contrast be central in inferring direction from cause to effect. The authors illuminate the aim and limitations of the various criteria that need to be included when discussing them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.