Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15911640›Full record

SynthesisJournal of epidemiology and community health2005

Validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale: a systematic review.

Monica Eriksson, Bengt Lindström

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 397 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
397citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06471452 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

To Live Better After Breast Cancer Treatment - a Randomized Pilot Trial of a Supportive and Person-centered Care Intervention in Primary Healthcare

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2023 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsBreast Cancer SurvivorshipArmsInteraktor
NCT06515119 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of the Resources-Oriented Salutogenic (ROS) Intervention on Sense of Coherence Among Pre-diabetes Population: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsSense of Coherence, Salutogenesis, PreDiabetesArmsResources-Oriented Salutogenic (ROS) intervention
NCT07167329 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The BELIEVE-VHL Trial: A Real-world Longitudinal Study on Belzutifan's Effectiveness, Pharmacogenetics, and Pharmacoeconomics in Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) Syndrome Using the HIF2α Inhibitor Belzutifan

TypeinterventionalSponsorJosé Claudio Casali da RochaRan2024 to 2030Enrolled100ConditionsVon Hippel Lindau, Von Hippel Lindau Disease, Von Hippel Lindau-Deficient Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Hemangioblastoma (HB) of the Central Nervous System (CNS)ArmsBelzutifan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

397 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Sense of Coherence in Nurses: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

337 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Monica ErikssonNordic School of Public Health, Box 12133, S-40242 Gothenburg, Sweden. bengt@nhv.se
Bengt Lindström

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveThe aim of this paper is to systematically review and analyse the validity and reliability of Antonovsky's life orientation questionnaire/sense of coherence scale (SOC).

designThe study is descriptive and analytical with a systematic integration of the contemporary knowledge base on the salutogenic research published 1992-2003. The review includes 458 scientific publications and 13 doctoral theses.

settingWorldwide, based on postgraduate scientific publications in eight authorized databases, doctoral theses, and available books. MAIN

resultsThe SOC questionnaire has been used in at least 33 languages in 32 countries with at least 15 different versions of the questionnaire. In 124 studies using SOC-29 the Cronbach's alpha ranges from 0.70 to 0.95. The alpha values in 127 studies using SOC-13 range from 0.70 to 0.92, and in 60 studies using a modified SOC scale range from 0.35 to 0.91. Test-retest correlation show stability and range from 0.69 to 0.78 (1 year), 0.64 (3 years), 0.42 to 0.45 (4 years), 0.59 to 0.67 (5 years) to 0.54 (10 years). The means of SOC-29 range 100.50 (SD 28.50) to 164.50 (SD 17.10) points and SOC-13 from 35.39 (SD 0.10) to 77.60 (SD 13.80) points. After 10 years SOC seems to be comparatively stable, but not as stable as Antonovsky initially assumed. SOC tends to increase with age. The factorial structure of SOC seems rather to be multidimensional than unidimensional. SOC predicts a positive outcome in a long term perspective, although there are divergent findings reported. The SOC scale seems to be a reliable, valid, and cross culturally applicable instrument measuring how people manage stressful situations and stay well.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalHealth Status IndicatorsInternal-External ControlSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitude to HealthHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID15911640
PMCPMC1757043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.